Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270776AbTG0Nrs (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 09:47:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270796AbTG0Nrr (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 09:47:47 -0400 Received: from hera.cwi.nl ([192.16.191.8]:35266 "EHLO hera.cwi.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270776AbTG0Nq4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 09:46:56 -0400 From: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 16:02:09 +0200 (MEST) Message-Id: To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, gtoumi@laposte.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test1 on alpha : disk label numbering trouble Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 696 Lines: 17 I'm trying to run 2.6.0-test1 on an alpha box, and apparently, the osf partition numbering is wrong: On this disk, I have c, d and e disklabels, which are seen by 2.2 and 2.4 as /dev/sda[345]. But 2.6.0-test1 number the slides starting at 1... so in 2.2/2.4 my root is sda5 and in 2.6, sda3. ouch. Is this an expected behaviour ? Can you give some information? Output of fdisk -l and dmesg | grep sda for 2.4 and 2.6? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/