Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp127119wra; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 19:14:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2256eS5rQngW5StzjlbWYJO3LP4nlMFRAQRFIZk7E3b6S7mzTeSh85ZCybJ9zt0l/r0IUlmh X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b43:: with SMTP id 61-v6mr16132960plq.127.1517022855336; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 19:14:15 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517022855; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bGTkLk4nIeuetYFQGzVkYrgfGd5Y67zHz19ivBb73NSAVDLcICus5rxz4ZjcCWiNh3 xCfKIKdMsKuCj+Ty8JIrLCAh4kqhYmfm25ENHEu62Bl0rvn1StauavYz0gPINwmYRjg2 hXgbUNHl8H1FQTMQzemiELwEWXHJtcDc7KfxFyqUEhyEpIDNDePwZ3LBCfU6Tg/FAIwb EPT+hcSstApG9q+JCPGRg6gLH00XyR6jHY8Qsz7Y0ILemvEhQvHE/QpH4Q+NpnYP+EtN UomnsKyzGdHzpGMvYb+W8He81LXgacHdMiSrW75Mh0AcqYEM1H7u26ZXuM2hBiX29fcx LEHQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=4oH8Y2MIGLJZscpR9owrYAFyaHjxLyw8aCTnOIbi8FI=; b=gdhlr+LITYJzkkwYmzw2Fes7IUYiDIn7POZqNWZyLUxhmdvptnIpSyEsHwW7X4N+LY S7Yu7nhod+URDRf2Uh3IftbP6smFDrMXiTWDpIIrKwvGIIVJpiW32rD33shM70zpogco 5xbNsRCs5Zi3jIkAXJXlH+cl6gTTCTja8mg+nKRGeVY9uM9d+W+iuThdU/IfzWe4wBrt 2Bcw7SjN3Ph1hG/KNUZdM/SPSWfF5gBtag45WsIo7HU8kfQwR2QAS3pevhSAvwvF36j+ x7K7MQyi032HnU7qDZRF8zgUBhhvQsazcJuoaLNu6Fea5XVz+OO7xTBWoxlOIECpL7Pw rPyg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QBBtJFFF; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p1-v6si4700426plo.170.2018.01.26.19.14.01; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 19:14:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QBBtJFFF; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751745AbeA0DNW (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 26 Jan 2018 22:13:22 -0500 Received: from mail-pl0-f68.google.com ([209.85.160.68]:43421 "EHLO mail-pl0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751405AbeA0DNV (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jan 2018 22:13:21 -0500 Received: by mail-pl0-f68.google.com with SMTP id f4so157586plr.10 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 19:13:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=4oH8Y2MIGLJZscpR9owrYAFyaHjxLyw8aCTnOIbi8FI=; b=QBBtJFFFPfNZGELW1Tvtg1l3ICcTX6ZyvlezHGtfk1CjFhHZJV+rEqw5l9zBgGyhge /xdRdSHqaaBY1Qejj9mMY9MUITLgJSq325WnYgvR3AfFOmSXKhbARGay0IMq2BLZpcp+ uTfowrXL/e3HXjdFX5PwO7nPVlVq+RL9YTAcDooMROlA2SNakCT8zNHij0oe0LSDKI0i x1fj7E6yLpd9jwuS/hX6R58nOGlDYDwE7Vuypq4Y/F9vd6kPrz7zh+LgQGwoDZjuQyKA enEdmIJyxOZzdwgLrZSGit3j4VvUoWg1cC23PWxooHH+NZ1N0wua5n8oEfWaVX6N6dkK L3zw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=4oH8Y2MIGLJZscpR9owrYAFyaHjxLyw8aCTnOIbi8FI=; b=DpqCYcipnkjJzXom6K69sRsyVp5U0k+JzMDtxIPyOkHhmE25N21/CqZIYZ76pR/b8c pXdyedvLkUG0aS/VVFxukSq+2dYao9su5QkyE1XPsXCGGFzeZIGX/ylWSKDwZaYsNrNM ve0uFYyfEIzq34zwEhQ5sHEFMiNCDE9kMSof68ME8y7xhyzLyNkjMWb9R9RRafVP2CGE eomjgrMc0xKC+Hqw/Kfic/7fAvNJjcjBHZHbLsqy8RfV8XOnom4YE961chpuYBODUDgO eEe6wikgGl4nupM9FCTyPGJ3obdViBv/7uNOagKTzKnfAlbV9oIhkct0GoxJBC2R/vK4 8V/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfiZNrQrUcRGPswKnCLz5mbBjkITW4q4vIqDLPfSXwWs2p0u2Ei KEayQO8bMmVto9rhbhgMfZc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:328:: with SMTP id 37-v6mr8890127pld.398.1517022800972; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 19:13:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (g190.219-103-172.ppp.wakwak.ne.jp. [219.103.172.190]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g77sm19713925pfk.49.2018.01.26.19.13.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 26 Jan 2018 19:13:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 12:13:18 +0900 From: Stafford Horne To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Palmer Dabbelt , linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, Will Deacon , jonas@southpole.se, stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi, tglx@linutronix.de, Arnd Bergmann , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@groups.riscv.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] openrisc: Use the new MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER Message-ID: <20180127031318.GA30895@lianli.shorne-pla.net> References: <20180125030756.21787-1-palmer@sifive.com> <20180125030756.21787-4-palmer@sifive.com> <20180125074619.GC14162@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180125074619.GC14162@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:46:19PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 07:07:55PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > It appears that openrisc copied arm64's MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER code (which > > came from arm). I wanted to make this generic so I could use it in the > > RISC-V port. This patch converts the openrisc code to use the generic > > version. > > Note that openriscv overrides previous handle_arch_irq assignments. > We'll need to know from the openrisc folks if that was intentional. > > Otherwise this looks fine to me. This looks fine to me too. We only assign the handle_arch_irq one time. I think not protecting against overrides was an oversight in the original implementation. Acked-by: Stafford Horne -Stafford