Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270821AbTG0PP0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 11:15:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270825AbTG0PP0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 11:15:26 -0400 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:20623 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270821AbTG0PPT (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 11:15:19 -0400 From: Bernd Eckenfels To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3) In-Reply-To: <1059315015.10692.207.camel@sonja> X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.5.19-20030610 ("Darts") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.20-xfs (i686)) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 17:30:31 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 712 Lines: 18 In article <1059315015.10692.207.camel@sonja> you wrote: > This is normally done by the filesystem (e.g. JFFS2). why is jffs2 so slow, if the cpu overhead can be totally neglected when writing to such slow media? I would asume a FS whic his optimized for not wearing out flash cards would reduce the IOs to the absolute minimum and therefore be fast be definition? Greetings Bernd -- eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/ Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/