Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270927AbTG0SbR (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 14:31:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270928AbTG0SbR (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 14:31:17 -0400 Received: from oak.sktc.net ([64.71.97.14]:62957 "EHLO oak.sktc.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270927AbTG0SbQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 14:31:16 -0400 Message-ID: <3F241DC0.7080408@sktc.net> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 13:45:20 -0500 From: "David D. Hagood" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Adrian Bunk , "Robert P. J. Day" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: time for some drivers to be removed? References: <20030727153118.GP22218@fs.tum.de> <3F23F6EB.7070502@sktc.net> <1059324018.13442.0.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1059324018.13442.0.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 636 Lines: 15 Alan Cox wrote: > We've had one for years. Its CONFIG_OBSOLETE, its even used in 2.6test I would disagree - OBSOLETE to me means just that - that module is obsolete. Minix FS, OSS (as opposed to ALSA), and the old non-SCSI, non-IDE HD interfaces would be OBSOLETE. Besides, I have seen cases where Firewire modules wouldn't build for some period of time - would you deem them OBSOLETE? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/