Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp3365190wra; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:12:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227lwGU4Op80vu8GtGxzE72mwQbdyU34PhignuEvEQayDA7OgPIYWzXe7zMRbA6Ni03eb5nF X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b7cb:: with SMTP id v11-v6mr22978896plz.393.1517256767742; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:12:47 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517256767; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=I3ICUQfMapODmq8ybVo9C3bhhBuFZ417i4jJVKuFgROwakZafHEoxNofHufhaKUi/4 fMrxVnupAEPNAraTP8jgk2+GcgubARrFEJzFKpunXwCN9cAjeUUwpDMM8zjq+SQkibmv hkXoySdpj2aWCnbAvMZADcxbi5pX9lgjXnDT1Wl0iCmiM1A8VbKYk4e9VaP0wJ6WzaaN eWnR2pxhE1I1ooHnhPEdBbPKIVim1oETkBiXnWDb9nxisksItLtkm/w8WlwVFlUz3uDS iGiPs4A2pna5kgwhoX827cEteXAtNKr9yxvbkvbBXFH4IFW+hx30bXmLhh+O7ZZNQys3 lS3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=j7fKgw6nbGVQWlIj19Wj0jynpqAKVMWXbrDV2Pd+OJE=; b=OHYX6EeyeQaZ99DY1+eao7DhC8FzmcZgd93m4pxMU/6iBoaQI0GmbEL+Gs77oYQuar DJpl+QRBrNszDUWMoI2iHgRMA1Ikc9l7nTDM62JqH9//SBzqy7VcgJrLX02GNOP8XW0F s6g8WXtWI14DJj59tVGfQnUsrHvyafq82nDMUab6OYZmc7dKEqIdES73NzdS3YwhTSAB v75UDjReqD2iyhiVwHXMsoafT9vywBFM+sDszCjToxZiZvxIg18VBbcQ66IF7xQq8HYO Z9z1yA7bGMJKqJpS11m/zh6WYUNOAwE4mIxx6DVDTfYQM17lDg1IkyqEtcigi2Tih081 EKmw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h187si11443pgc.531.2018.01.29.12.12.33; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:12:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752957AbeA2UMG (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:12:06 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33950 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753886AbeA2UME (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:12:04 -0500 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12258-90.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.71.90]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 635EE2F98; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:06:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+7b7b518b1228d2743963@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Neil Horman , Xin Long , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 4.9 43/66] sctp: do not allow the v4 socket to bind a v4mapped v6 address Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:57:07 +0100 Message-Id: <20180129123842.154208303@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.1 In-Reply-To: <20180129123839.842860149@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180129123839.842860149@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Xin Long [ Upstream commit c5006b8aa74599ce19104b31d322d2ea9ff887cc ] The check in sctp_sockaddr_af is not robust enough to forbid binding a v4mapped v6 addr on a v4 socket. The worse thing is that v4 socket's bind_verify would not convert this v4mapped v6 addr to a v4 addr. syzbot even reported a crash as the v4 socket bound a v6 addr. This patch is to fix it by doing the common sa.sa_family check first, then AF_INET check for v4mapped v6 addrs. Fixes: 7dab83de50c7 ("sctp: Support ipv6only AF_INET6 sockets.") Reported-by: syzbot+7b7b518b1228d2743963@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Acked-by: Neil Horman Signed-off-by: Xin Long Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/sctp/socket.c | 14 ++++++-------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) --- a/net/sctp/socket.c +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c @@ -332,16 +332,14 @@ static struct sctp_af *sctp_sockaddr_af( if (len < sizeof (struct sockaddr)) return NULL; + if (!opt->pf->af_supported(addr->sa.sa_family, opt)) + return NULL; + /* V4 mapped address are really of AF_INET family */ if (addr->sa.sa_family == AF_INET6 && - ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&addr->v6.sin6_addr)) { - if (!opt->pf->af_supported(AF_INET, opt)) - return NULL; - } else { - /* Does this PF support this AF? */ - if (!opt->pf->af_supported(addr->sa.sa_family, opt)) - return NULL; - } + ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&addr->v6.sin6_addr) && + !opt->pf->af_supported(AF_INET, opt)) + return NULL; /* If we get this far, af is valid. */ af = sctp_get_af_specific(addr->sa.sa_family);