Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp3403015wra; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:40:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2278yoQO2k8gpUJ5T8Ky6t6fxb0l6J6I2HzkVDp4Xy/clsEKYKcv4rEG9aZrsSzo2hI6ICCK X-Received: by 10.98.233.10 with SMTP id j10mr27525224pfh.123.1517258427258; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:40:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517258427; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zz8+iKMwsVMbn0bazAzyz+PN8mypmGYMz9LTBJpsAx1+DVXoFoCA8zw4T8CBgg22PW cx6GXWZ1zHvY4TMWvdaoOmzImR8Dum7Rpdr7gTL10JA6f1I99at90sCrmAOhZNTjfrQq WmugFpC426y4eI5w/SK3dcyiSJXK7F2EYaeFRPD/i1GBPcXrWQcpNpvcQJrmYUGp23ww nwd7jjbRQn7aHl9gvmK48ofFPwB+s/lhE9nNjHZahb8JeoC7/ZxwOTEchiWAaWpiRoQQ X7GXgz4sAfkBJsNQ7BJQyQV91OV2qbHPh6opa2N/DK2JnTFx76qU0g1Y0t+6YwIBE/89 QDVQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=9+enPllsChDobChGF6MXID5vRM84efTvPvirwGz9NV8=; b=HqM9UnprqlKv1TmTcIZJyUIlRBAvFo2KeceQAUq9V1aHMNJ7caytXfUZd2rxd7rLdJ +E52mGRTCjz5WXdmvTmXdy326DFKc41ux7r3hBUzOLS5S99X1DLxFKr0ULwKyy34/RRu HjaC8imjpc2uqFfUeZu3XhyFG/6IFJQ2NAFWu4+WiQ8Mz12cMUkrY7FYz0n0LoTW4YKp Om/BhKn4x7KZAzS06rlisPzCNZtBPfM+5Ih1KQ4ajLjuRBl7hvpIvRKTykpdgJ2MlqtX iLrsz2zy9KVz4Lzub7QbFGnaM2O3LwYehhJwJKgFRo4ukzW0Td3H78K8lRmlo0ytoaC4 23wA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 90si244425pfs.287.2018.01.29.12.40.12; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:40:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932173AbeA2Uil (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:38:41 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37618 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753049AbeA2UN0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:13:26 -0500 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12258-90.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.71.90]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 795FD2F0A; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:02:04 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Colitti , Pau Espin Pedrol , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Michal Kubecek Subject: [PATCH 4.4 37/74] netfilter: use fwmark_reflect in nf_send_reset Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:56:42 +0100 Message-Id: <20180129123849.261585273@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.1 In-Reply-To: <20180129123847.507563674@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180129123847.507563674@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Pau Espin Pedrol commit cc31d43b4154ad5a7d8aa5543255a93b7e89edc2 upstream. Otherwise, RST packets generated by ipt_REJECT always have mark 0 when the routing is checked later in the same code path. Fixes: e110861f8609 ("net: add a sysctl to reflect the fwmark on replies") Cc: Lorenzo Colitti Signed-off-by: Pau Espin Pedrol Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso Acked-by: Michal Kubecek Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.c | 2 ++ net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.c +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.c @@ -124,6 +124,8 @@ void nf_send_reset(struct net *net, stru /* ip_route_me_harder expects skb->dst to be set */ skb_dst_set_noref(nskb, skb_dst(oldskb)); + nskb->mark = IP4_REPLY_MARK(net, oldskb->mark); + skb_reserve(nskb, LL_MAX_HEADER); niph = nf_reject_iphdr_put(nskb, oldskb, IPPROTO_TCP, ip4_dst_hoplimit(skb_dst(nskb))); --- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c +++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ void nf_send_reset6(struct net *net, str fl6.daddr = oip6h->saddr; fl6.fl6_sport = otcph->dest; fl6.fl6_dport = otcph->source; + fl6.flowi6_mark = IP6_REPLY_MARK(net, oldskb->mark); security_skb_classify_flow(oldskb, flowi6_to_flowi(&fl6)); dst = ip6_route_output(net, NULL, &fl6); if (dst == NULL || dst->error) { @@ -180,6 +181,8 @@ void nf_send_reset6(struct net *net, str skb_dst_set(nskb, dst); + nskb->mark = fl6.flowi6_mark; + skb_reserve(nskb, hh_len + dst->header_len); ip6h = nf_reject_ip6hdr_put(nskb, oldskb, IPPROTO_TCP, ip6_dst_hoplimit(dst));