Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp3414217wra; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:50:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225hX9nxIk0hky3bwnif03Taa5Ri7NGoeCB/85mtOWr5TmhWXeTgOnTdL9VyTPfBh2PLBikE X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8c81:: with SMTP id t1-v6mr22555303plo.363.1517259021225; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:50:21 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517259021; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ILZ025tPDozZkzxBZMND1Va0gRgTKM/bzPCSWb2wkRqA8f7ikDvMcHEs0TByyusmmd l0h6q/Q0hDgYrAGhgobL+CzjHfOgwESZzHUCE0WRvv0MWKSv2lZzq58bUPPmQ8W4Tu/U MZFfLLZfimpD5Rssl9bWRg7FsVCzqCoYBB+e6eDXOwzH3QW0P0xh4uSwvIa0gET37CxS F1y3ZPvug04OQCB96EHjOQPmz0e1jt7ItLAcBQpA8wlwQVFzgJ74/n09Dn3TpYSSxqei 74QdTDAx2K8KhlQlGg76Z4AajsIQaUzP0YMXWQ9LR/CT/Xm4e4zvYj2yBy7syoxbWkpE DoKw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=n1XJ2k8EgoG/6f9zRyDvVGvVitZGyH1hNTLpJRww0Es=; b=k8Dvqbn0SstV1wrM/QfyPrxt0v1jl+Cotv/1xsKShPknAxe+HVqdPzGEGr6eZ1Yd/2 LNHGe9Zlc60ieRC6MVBsu0Wj3ll/8Lc6gIRIGUpIoSackY0nNrrZ+GyRghdDWqqRdgFi zHVarNyQepHRhdn+Tz7/7qFvKJui4N+YQcX9s0s8TU757QdcACRKXPRQ2dHGEW8RD+xe DHFRzF0Vu7F3GWcFUclX2NeNgCMxl3D3Ga7KZnW/dAhEVGm8TgVBarvT51uU113mTYBE wJ3P2od1do7eJNEWYiEcGo1L1al69ICwKQp3pdpCB5bv13aPhtmKDqkGQ7RwJLQwI53b zwGg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v34-v6si10103279plg.803.2018.01.29.12.50.06; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:50:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753697AbeA2ULb (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:11:31 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:60378 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753672AbeA2UL0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:11:26 -0500 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12258-90.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.71.90]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D13D2FBC; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:07:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, "ast@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann" , syzbot+93c4904c5c70348a6890@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann Subject: [PATCH 4.9 62/66] bpf: arsh is not supported in 32 bit alu thus reject it Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:57:26 +0100 Message-Id: <20180129123843.167617307@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.1 In-Reply-To: <20180129123839.842860149@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180129123839.842860149@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Daniel Borkmann [ upstream commit 7891a87efc7116590eaba57acc3c422487802c6f ] The following snippet was throwing an 'unknown opcode cc' warning in BPF interpreter: 0: (18) r0 = 0x0 2: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r0 3: (cc) (u32) r0 s>>= (u32) r0 4: (95) exit Although a number of JITs do support BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_{K,X} generation, not all of them do and interpreter does neither. We can leave existing ones and implement it later in bpf-next for the remaining ones, but reject this properly in verifier for the time being. Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)") Reported-by: syzbot+93c4904c5c70348a6890@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -1843,6 +1843,11 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verif return -EINVAL; } + if (opcode == BPF_ARSH && BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_ALU64) { + verbose("BPF_ARSH not supported for 32 bit ALU\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + if ((opcode == BPF_LSH || opcode == BPF_RSH || opcode == BPF_ARSH) && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) { int size = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 ? 64 : 32;