Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org,
        syzbot+4386709c0c1284dca827@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 07/66] can: af_can: can_rcv(): replace WARN_ONCE by pr_warn_once
Date:   Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:56:31 +0100
Message-Id: <20180129123840.217620076@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180129123839.842860149@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20180129123839.842860149@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

commit 8cb68751c115d176ec851ca56ecfbb411568c9e8 upstream.

If an invalid CAN frame is received, from a driver or from a tun
interface, a Kernel warning is generated.

This patch replaces the WARN_ONCE by a simple pr_warn_once, so that a
kernel, bootet with panic_on_warn, does not panic. A printk seems to be
more appropriate here.

Reported-by: syzbot+4386709c0c1284dca827@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Suggested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>


---
 net/can/af_can.c |   11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/net/can/af_can.c
+++ b/net/can/af_can.c
@@ -722,13 +722,12 @@ static int can_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (unlikely(!net_eq(dev_net(dev), &init_net)))
 		goto drop;
 
-	if (WARN_ONCE(dev->type != ARPHRD_CAN ||
-		      skb->len != CAN_MTU ||
-		      cfd->len > CAN_MAX_DLEN,
-		      "PF_CAN: dropped non conform CAN skbuf: "
-		      "dev type %d, len %d, datalen %d\n",
-		      dev->type, skb->len, cfd->len))
+	if (unlikely(dev->type != ARPHRD_CAN || skb->len != CAN_MTU ||
+		     cfd->len > CAN_MAX_DLEN)) {
+		pr_warn_once("PF_CAN: dropped non conform CAN skbuf: dev type %d, len %d, datalen %d\n",
+			     dev->type, skb->len, cfd->len);
 		goto drop;
+	}
 
 	can_receive(skb, dev);
 	return NET_RX_SUCCESS;