Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp3426866wra; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:01:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225CoUBM8MOuaWVnVWTycreyVnIP/urGqY4otY5uhdKZjYHheiwqocPxhlksE9SMpW1pJWfT X-Received: by 10.99.39.1 with SMTP id n1mr12070647pgn.155.1517259710041; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:01:50 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517259710; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VLlCAPHv43gZbwcs+JYApl+n0H/pnkhV7hG4WHZzevQ2ND7KhSkgucfdNRsLi9N6zO n+y9pEob7iz1klQBalznjQ8qaF8UYQs2awK4nagwndOigRHHIwjpHAlS6N7ULInbOeTH bjC4t3fBjexwn1Ovon+tKSXKaYWk9J5WUnUEQQhRTvz4CFeSrgdRXWyKKmZ/JGdtwol+ JYt6SDiTe9ZdS7Y7hld6N7cJUdG49HmptwVb5XLAjf+y3WQrQnFTtMu0SljVsarRsSUR g4onmVbaXJ5cCs95FShoMMEddr0caD8MEZWzQ7JB4hzoIQoyZZNov1tc7vU/Gw/CpQ3F ZOzA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=u6KyOVNudpJNTxFXJfOIyQQb5VZKG9wNLPXxXOcTs9k=; b=BvDcxrQWU3Avuv3q+USGB+CQQOVYObB/yXSxiww0EDtbwTnSI+HOSNbC35vwRRPFZu 0f1xZ3qlpaUY0vaXTYRfP95kcBZ0W1mty7IcLZvCibVEF4nBadAhq3pjXpMrMQLq9NBq cW6e2i7CIJHfbzI6IpeTWzcsMclvUIoDYSTITO8XmKGr72HVzG3T6tmF+X4HAVsKhxsF uYc/qW+Gj7DU3yO8DrxxQ7bMsH/xkqQG/ihoIzo7Wx3ESUkpE1uSvWDPSmtQh0YS8TL0 uDxZMDAKIB7ns9ju/N4IPQ2ShRcWEuMF23FIifxmSnUh1LrIGx2uFReJw6CBmjPXJR1J KKQw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w12-v6si10037470plz.111.2018.01.29.13.01.35; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:01:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751810AbeA2VBI (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:01:08 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:52758 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753080AbeA2UI0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:08:26 -0500 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12258-90.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.71.90]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1157302F; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:10:28 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Jia Zhang , Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner , Tony Luck Subject: [PATCH 4.14 61/71] x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW late-loading further with LLC size check Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:57:29 +0100 Message-Id: <20180129123831.709681800@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.1 In-Reply-To: <20180129123827.271171825@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180129123827.271171825@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jia Zhang commit 7e702d17ed138cf4ae7c00e8c00681ed464587c7 upstream. Commit b94b73733171 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW late-loading with a revision check") reduced the impact of erratum BDF90 for Broadwell model 79. The impact can be reduced further by checking the size of the last level cache portion per core. Tony: "The erratum says the problem only occurs on the large-cache SKUs. So we only need to avoid the update if we are on a big cache SKU that is also running old microcode." For more details, see erratum BDF90 in document #334165 (Intel Xeon Processor E7-8800/4800 v4 Product Family Specification Update) from September 2017. Fixes: b94b73733171 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW late-loading with a revision check") Signed-off-by: Jia Zhang Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Tony Luck Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1516321542-31161-1-git-send-email-zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ static const char ucode_path[] = "kernel /* Current microcode patch used in early patching on the APs. */ static struct microcode_intel *intel_ucode_patch; +/* last level cache size per core */ +static int llc_size_per_core; + static inline bool cpu_signatures_match(unsigned int s1, unsigned int p1, unsigned int s2, unsigned int p2) { @@ -912,12 +915,14 @@ static bool is_blacklisted(unsigned int /* * Late loading on model 79 with microcode revision less than 0x0b000021 - * may result in a system hang. This behavior is documented in item - * BDF90, #334165 (Intel Xeon Processor E7-8800/4800 v4 Product Family). + * and LLC size per core bigger than 2.5MB may result in a system hang. + * This behavior is documented in item BDF90, #334165 (Intel Xeon + * Processor E7-8800/4800 v4 Product Family). */ if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_X && c->x86_mask == 0x01 && + llc_size_per_core > 2621440 && c->microcode < 0x0b000021) { pr_err_once("Erratum BDF90: late loading with revision < 0x0b000021 (0x%x) disabled.\n", c->microcode); pr_err_once("Please consider either early loading through initrd/built-in or a potential BIOS update.\n"); @@ -975,6 +980,15 @@ static struct microcode_ops microcode_in .apply_microcode = apply_microcode_intel, }; +static int __init calc_llc_size_per_core(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) +{ + u64 llc_size = c->x86_cache_size * 1024; + + do_div(llc_size, c->x86_max_cores); + + return (int)llc_size; +} + struct microcode_ops * __init init_intel_microcode(void) { struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data; @@ -985,5 +999,7 @@ struct microcode_ops * __init init_intel return NULL; } + llc_size_per_core = calc_llc_size_per_core(c); + return µcode_intel_ops; }