Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp3876331wra; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:44:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224okr1a4Un30muCrqgtGuQzXTst5eK21ONNL/gQ8YQVtgvGt8sSa9s8P8nWpmxmB8UmleMP X-Received: by 10.101.82.130 with SMTP id y2mr23743826pgp.109.1517291072830; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:44:32 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517291072; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yVoLlyrs1QI2woLF1QHiHvUxTtTIjifGzIgOY6FmmrWaSGjHVAxBg37txhJvir1ZT5 OQUolTKR4bkU7c4JAHt4xdW+b0hR4nRhTXjwAEnTh/T1KOe6ZBORRDSi83WfKh2+Eo8v ay+gLJdMQ6/Ep8M0VfunGztfsOs7PlYMnqli6qq9pJFcGnBJ8FElccASZ9wuyqCY+N8G b587O3dGEvWfWTZqAeM86iqvsngk7U50qy8KyX0fnEMzjPPUwZJsoXOoTv9iOrjFGb4s f+Z56Aj1JmcIVBRH88J1UNraGwYQ11EPpD1zBoYeVrYfNjOffZKQi5o3YVXSAawEUAkm y87w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dmarc-filter:arc-authentication-results; bh=tUpONxL5/0ZUkiHghPVNWV1heU5pKph8rCxTMmrMtx8=; b=HjZ/JWiwQ75iDHKtzlrSMUF4AQHaE1kX6MksLHFblOQ+hzw5EaIH2vVSCc7aw16J3q KlYaVQVCB6Dd/0VoV9jhUyTdJa/qJRQXhMc2W9z4vnhzkSbaz+ofXEskJw4bly+D+Kn9 gd5krISHWgGRtg5UAcBC1By1+9N1Ii1Pw4QX6+8OQxxoVyppPe1z77ftdpoRKjrGrlaR 7LPwPTlEcQ+wO4CfjZL9FE2PjiCp4SQnOHtTQvsIimAXAvrGoW5aDxOrI36S6PtW1qmc 5S4mkGvIT6T7iNamJ1gycoxwYDKXawheO6W1PFHstmKAn1xE4tkyFxwkMWp+RF7cWPdZ tIhg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 43-v6si4292804plc.167.2018.01.29.21.44.17; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:44:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752775AbeA3Fnw (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:43:52 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41686 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752293AbeA3Fnv (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:43:51 -0500 Received: from devbox (NE2965lan1.rev.em-net.ne.jp [210.141.244.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FA3C2175D; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 05:43:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1FA3C2175D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=mhiramat@kernel.org Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:43:46 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu To: Pintu Kumar Cc: "Wangnan (F)" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@redhat.com, quentin.monnet@netronome.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, davem@davemloft.net, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, huawei.libin@huawei.com, Alexis Berlemont , maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org Subject: Re: [perf] perf probe fails sometimes on 4.9 Message-Id: <20180130144346.86307346478928ca872473b5@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20180129231723.524a8c32e1456358f7cb88ce@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:00:52 +0530 Pintu Kumar wrote: > Dear Masami, > > Thank you so much for your reply. > Please find some of my answers inline. > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 7:47 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:40:34 +0530 > > Pintu Kumar wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> 'perf probe' is failing sometimes on 4.9.20 with AMD-64. > >> # perf probe --add schedule > >> schedule is out of .text, skip it. > >> Error: Failed to add events. > >> > >> If any one have come across this problem please let me know the cause. > > > > Hi Pintu, > > > > Could you run it with --vv? > > > Ok, I will send verbose output by tomorrow. > > >> > >> Note: I don't have CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO enabled in kernel. Is this the problem? > > > > Without it, you can not probe source-level probe nor trace local variable. > > > > Currently I am facing problem in enabling DEBUG_INFO in our kernel 4.9.20 > However, I will try to manually include "-g" option during compilation. > > >> However, I manually copied the vmlinux file to /boot/ directory, but > >> still it does not work. > > > > That doesn't work. > > CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO option enables gcc to compile kernel with extra debuginfo. > > Without that option, debuginfo is not generated with vmlinux. > > > >> > >> I checked upstream patches until 4.15 but could not find any clue. > >> Please let me know if there is any fixes available for this. > > > > Could you also ensure that you run perf by root user? > > > > Yes I am running with root user. > > My concern is sometimes it works but sometimes it fails. What I thought was that your kernel enables kptr_strict(but maybe not.) Can you also try to find "schedule" and "_etext" functions in /proc/kallsyms? > I still needs to figure out, in which condition it works and which > condition it fails. Yeah, it is important. > Usually I noticed that in fresh reboot case it works. So, after a while, it doesn't work again? If so, it sounds like a daemon process changes settings in background. Thank you, > > > > Thank you, > > > > > >> > >> > >> Thank You! > >> Regards, > >> Pintu > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:09 PM, Pintu Kumar wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > ** Changed the subject now, since these issues are related to general > >> > perf commands. > >> > > >> > Following are the issues: > >> > > >> > 1) perf probe --add schedule - FAILED > >> > output: > >> > schedule is out of .text, skip it. > >> > Error: Failed to add events. > >> > > >> > what is the issue here? > >> > Sometimes it pass and sometimes it fails... > >> > Similar is the case of 'perf inject' as well. > >> > > >> > 2) perf test - 1 FAILURE > >> > 37.1: Test basic BPF filtering : FAILED! > >> > 37.2: Test BPF prologue generation : Skip > >> > 37.3: Test BPF relocation checker : Skip > >> > > >> > bpf: config program 'func=SyS_epoll_wait' > >> > symbol:SyS_epoll_wait file:(null) line:0 offset:0 return:0 lazy:(null) > >> > bpf: config 'func=SyS_epoll_wait' is ok > >> > Looking at the vmlinux_path (8 entries long) > >> > Using /boot/vmlinux for symbols > >> > Could not open debuginfo. Try to use symbols. > >> > SyS_epoll_wait is out of .text, skip it. > >> > bpf_probe: failed to convert perf probe eventsFailed to add events > >> > selected by BPF > >> > test child finished with -1 > >> > ---- end ---- > >> > Test BPF filter subtest 0: FAILED! > >> > > >> > Looks like both 1,2 are related. > >> > Since, CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO is not enabled, I manually copied the vmlinux > >> > to /boot/ folder. > >> > > >> > ------- > >> > Some more info: > >> > > >> > Kernel build dir is set to /lib/modules/4.9.20-sc-amd-x86-64/build > >> > set env: KBUILD_DIR=/lib/modules/4.9.20-sc-amd-x86-64/build > >> > unset env: KBUILD_OPTS > >> > include option is set to -nostdinc -isystem > >> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/include -I./arch/x86/include > >> > -I./arch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I./arch/x86/include/generated > >> > -I./include -I./arch/x86/include/uapi -I./include/uapi > >> > -I./include/generated/uapi -include ./include/linux/kconfig.h > >> > set env: NR_CPUS=8 > >> > set env: LINUX_VERSION_CODE=0x40914 > >> > set env: CLANG_EXEC=/usr/bin/clang > >> > set env: CLANG_OPTIONS=-xc > >> > set env: KERNEL_INC_OPTIONS= -nostdinc -isystem > >> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/include -I./arch/x86/include > >> > -I./arch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I./arch/x86/include/generated > >> > -I./include -I./arch/x86/include/uapi -I./include/uapi > >> > -I./include/generated/uapi -include ./include/linux/kconfig.h > >> > set env: WORKING_DIR=/lib/modules/4.9.20-sc-amd-x86-64/build > >> > > >> > > >> > If you have any clue about these failure please help me. > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Pintu > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 8:23 PM, Pintu Kumar wrote: > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> Thanks for your help. > >> >> Yes it was a sub version issue. > >> >> > >> >> Earlier, while building the kernel I left the SUBLEVEL as blank. > >> >> > >> >> make -j8 bindeb-pkg SUBLEVEL=20 > >> >> > >> >> After passing the correct sublevel now the test is working. > >> >> > >> >> But still following are failing: > >> >> > >> >> 16: Try 'import perf' in python, checking link problems : FAILED! > >> >> 37.2: Test BPF prologue generation : FAILED! > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> This is the error I get: > >> >> > >> >> 16: Try 'import perf' in python, checking link problems : > >> >> --- start --- > >> >> test child forked, pid 7637 > >> >> Traceback (most recent call last): > >> >> File "", line 1, in > >> >> ImportError: No module named perf > >> >> test child finished with -1 > >> >> ---- end ---- > >> >> Try 'import perf' in python, checking link problems: FAILED! > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Looking at the vmlinux_path (8 entries long) > >> >> symsrc__init: cannot get elf header. > >> >> Failed to find the path for kernel: Invalid ELF file > >> >> bpf_probe: failed to convert perf probe eventsFailed to add events > >> >> selected by BPF > >> >> test child finished with -1 > >> >> ---- end ---- > >> >> Test BPF filter subtest 1: FAILED! > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Pintu > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 6:39 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On 2018/1/23 20:37, Pintu Kumar wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Hi All, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I am verifying all perf tests on Ubuntu-16 x86-64 platform using the > >> >>>> kernel version 4.9.20. > >> >>>> I have installed several others packages including: clang, llvm > >> >>>> > >> >>>> But, when I run 'perf test' I get some FAILURE. > >> >>>> Specially, 'perf test LLVM' is failing. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Please check the below error logs: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------- > >> >>>> # perf test LLVM > >> >>>> 35: Test LLVM searching and compiling : > >> >>>> 35.1: Basic BPF llvm compiling test : FAILED! > >> >>>> 35.2: Test kbuild searching : Skip > >> >>>> 35.3: Compile source for BPF prologue generation test : Skip > >> >>>> 35.4: Compile source for BPF relocation test : Skip > >> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------- > >> >>>> > >> >>>> When I run with -v I get this: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------- > >> >>>> # perf test -v LLVM > >> >>>> 35: Test LLVM searching and compiling : > >> >>>> 35.1: Basic BPF llvm compiling test : > >> >>>> --- start --- > >> >>>> test child forked, pid 3304 > >> >>>> Unablt to get kernel version from uname '4.9-xxxx-amd-x86-64' > >> >>>> WARNING: unable to get correct kernel building directory. > >> >>>> Hint: Set correct kbuild directory using 'kbuild-dir' option in [llvm] > >> >>>> section of ~/.perfconfig or set it to "" to suppress kbuild > >> >>>> detection. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Unablt to get kernel version from uname '4.9-xxxx-amd-x86-64' > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> int _version SEC("version") = LINUX_VERSION_CODE; > >> >>>> ' | $CLANG_EXEC -D__KERNEL__ -D__NR_CPUS__=$NR_CPUS > >> >>>> -DLINUX_VERSION_CODE=$LINUX_VERSION_CODE $CLANG_OPTIONS > >> >>>> $KERNEL_INC_OPTIONS -Wno-unused-value -Wno-pointer-sign > >> >>>> -working-directory $WORKING_DIR -c "$CLANG_SOURCE" -target bpf -O2 -o > >> >>>> - > >> >>>> libbpf: 2129190-4a0 doesn't provide kernel version > >> >>>> Failed to parse test case 'Basic BPF llvm compiling test' > >> >>>> test child finished with -1 > >> >>>> ---- end ---- > >> >>>> Test LLVM searching and compiling subtest 0: FAILED! > >> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------- > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Basic BPF LLVM compiling test is failing. > >> >>>> It reports that bpf could not able to read the kernel version from uname. > >> >>>> Is it because of this that 'perf test LLVM' is failing ? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> My uname says: > >> >>>> 4.9-xxxx-amd-x86-64 > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> 'perf test LLVM' requires a well formed uname string (%d.%d.%d). Please see > >> >>> tools/perf/fetch_kernel_version . If your distro uses another method to > >> >>> report > >> >>> kernel version number (from your uname string, sublevel can't be > >> >>> determined), > >> >>> please help us improve that function like what we have done for ubuntu > >> >>> (checking /proc/version_signature). > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>>> My kernel version is: 4.9.20 (from Makefile) > >> >>>> > >> >>>> So, I dont think there is any problem with kernel version. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> If any body have come across this problem please let me know how to > >> >>>> resolve this issue. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Thank You! > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Regards, > >> >>>> Pintu > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > > > > > -- > > Masami Hiramatsu -- Masami Hiramatsu