Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp4420905wra; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 07:06:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225w9RMQ3iA8Lj39L9TYE0JBdnFNSRoLwNkWZHtwzfEhYN0FCgMNPaxvcaMqp7wdsx/i7Mkj X-Received: by 10.101.96.132 with SMTP id t4mr23688846pgu.58.1517324773221; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 07:06:13 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517324773; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jAuByPPSF9IrKAh6s9RiZV5Rgpwe6bXnjf7B9fzNtmF4IyAe36UJgCEtShpPHQKOTa VSEHORRipcsBZFoQiIBpoDGXPkQhrkAbpF3vay/VJw52IkcxBW1fikWtGR3OJ7BOhp4E 5V9kZW6hHHQvC1krdvMeoKmcpFP2aJ/JStzfC+Sf/AI7tRlAysbFEKOz5thGjSgWiGwo XJ+Y9aDk+AB9KktrYSnMawtGTYoMWUXb5M7h+ezmQ3o1iJbikiK35aiundVY2mdyCd4c ll1fQ9PF55NQ8rC2j0TEi9NZpZ5Pxuj1fuF482M/dY6omoUgKXK+9jVJHR7Kqimm51LM WLiA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=3grmhgiAFJZ/vdMcqwgsjH+xNPUw/vfWSPbqhVmtgrE=; b=ZRLRQxANsXMqmN0O30JU7WZL5Gv4C422HbnK/DUnF4cC3wMISngH9+sFd7yKfcK6aA acAPZ8aDCLPBCiOvQYbqlwQNuvJuO5WlHyKpdKy2f1zjtxNZnRma7pLB/k2LcZE2NpF3 ij/HZqQDuEOkPQIe/bfq3KKG5VGMM5Hb2kPO4FzmTdOCkMbzjAn3Y1eocARwbIRvSh9t L7QfReAMGcY9ZVfREjVtBaDs6xD+O+5aqYWuVIFk6Hp+9yMuYerBPBn7S5LpgJpuFmSI XWeYvFOZt4bedXES4kfepzZdM46s1H00aSDAOiMHn56CnizBotjWc6taATQT/nTNleY/ ejVQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a3-v6si39988plc.552.2018.01.30.07.05.57; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 07:06:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752175AbeA3PF2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:05:28 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26090 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751256AbeA3PF1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:05:27 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 637EDC00C913; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krava (unknown [10.43.17.162]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 392375EDE0; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:04:54 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: "Liang, Kan" Cc: Stephane Eranian , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , LKML , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Thomas Gleixner , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/5] bugs fix for large PEBS mmap read and rdpmc read Message-ID: <20180130150454.GE29098@krava> References: <1517243373-355481-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> <20180130133917.GC29098@krava> <6d708c09-52a7-a906-b651-b133a7b4f189@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6d708c09-52a7-a906-b651-b133a7b4f189@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 09:59:15AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote: > > > On 1/30/2018 8:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 01:16:39AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:29 AM, wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Kan Liang > > > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > > > Changes since V2: > > > > - Refined the changelog > > > > - Introduced specific read function for large PEBS. > > > > The previous generic PEBS read function is confusing. > > > > Disabled PMU in pmu::read() path for large PEBS. > > > > Handled the corner case when reload_times == 0. > > > > - Modified the parameter of intel_pmu_save_and_restart_reload() > > > > Discarded local64_cmpxchg > > > > - Added fixes tag > > > > - Added WARN to handle reload_times == 0 || reload_val == 0 > > > > > > > > Changes since V1: > > > > - Check PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD before call > > > > intel_pmu_save_and_restore() > > > > > > It is not yet clear to me why PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD is not allowed > > > with large PEBS. Large PEBS requires fixed period. So the kernel could > > > make up the period from the event and store it in the sampling buffer. > > > > > > I tried using large PEBS recently, and despite trying different option > > > combination of perf record, I was not able to get it to work. > > > > > > $ perf record -c 1 -e cpu/event=0xd1,umask=0x10,period=19936/pp > > > --no-timestamp --no-period -a -C 0 > > > > > > But I was able to make this work with a much older kernel. > > > > > > Another annoyance I ran into is with perf record requiring -c period > > > in order not to set > > > PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD in the event. > > > > > > If I do: > > > perf record -c 1 -e cpu/event=0xd1,umask=0x10,period=19936/pp > > > --no-timestamp --no-period -a -C 0 > > > > > > I get > > > > > > perf_event_attr: > > > type 4 > > > size 112 > > > config 0x10d1 > > > { sample_period, sample_freq } 199936 > > > sample_type IP|TID|CPU > > > > > > But if I do: > > > perf record -e cpu/event=0xd1,umask=0x10,period=19936/pp > > > --no-timestamp --no-period -a -C 0 > > > > > > I get > > > > > > perf_event_attr: > > > type 4 > > > size 112 > > > config 0x10d1 > > > { sample_period, sample_freq } 199936 > > > sample_type IP|TID|CPU|PERIOD > > > > > > Perf should check if all events have a period=, then it should not > > > pass PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD, even > > > more so when only one event is defined. > > > > > > Also it does not seem to honor --no-period. > > > > yep, there's a bug in period=x term handling > > we did not re/set the sample_type based on that > > > > attached patch fixes that for me, also takes into account > > the --no/-period options > > > > jirka > > > > > > --- > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c > > index f251e824edac..907267206973 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c > > @@ -1566,7 +1566,8 @@ static struct option __record_options[] = { > > OPT_BOOLEAN_SET('T', "timestamp", &record.opts.sample_time, > > &record.opts.sample_time_set, > > "Record the sample timestamps"), > > - OPT_BOOLEAN('P', "period", &record.opts.period, "Record the sample period"), > > + OPT_BOOLEAN_SET('P', "period", &record.opts.period, &record.opts.period_set, > > + "Record the sample period"), > > OPT_BOOLEAN('n', "no-samples", &record.opts.no_samples, > > "don't sample"), > > OPT_BOOLEAN_SET('N', "no-buildid-cache", &record.no_buildid_cache, > > diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.h b/tools/perf/perf.h > > index 2357f4ccc9c7..cfe46236a5e5 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/perf.h > > +++ b/tools/perf/perf.h > > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct record_opts { > > bool sample_time_set; > > bool sample_cpu; > > bool period; > > + bool period_set; > > bool running_time; > > bool full_auxtrace; > > bool auxtrace_snapshot_mode; > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c > > index 66fa45198a11..ff359c9ece2e 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c > > @@ -745,12 +745,14 @@ static void apply_config_terms(struct perf_evsel *evsel, > > if (!(term->weak && opts->user_interval != ULLONG_MAX)) { > > attr->sample_period = term->val.period; > > attr->freq = 0; > > + perf_evsel__reset_sample_bit(evsel, PERIOD); > > } > > break; > > case PERF_EVSEL__CONFIG_TERM_FREQ: > > if (!(term->weak && opts->user_freq != UINT_MAX)) { > > attr->sample_freq = term->val.freq; > > attr->freq = 1; > > + perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, PERIOD); > > } > > If we do so, some events could be in fixed mode without PERIOD set. Other > events could be in freq mode with PERIOD set. it also sets the attr->freq, so it's not in fixed mode jirka