Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272737AbTG1IlH (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 04:41:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272750AbTG1IjO (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 04:39:14 -0400 Received: from lidskialf.net ([62.3.233.115]:39895 "EHLO beyond.lidskialf.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272749AbTG1IiU (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 04:38:20 -0400 From: Andrew de Quincey To: Marcelo Penna Guerra , Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvidia nforce 1.0-261 nvnet for kernel 2.5 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:53:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: Rahul Karnik , lkml , Laurens References: <200307262309.20074.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net> <3F2477C4.2000105@pobox.com> <200307272011.51631.eu@marcelopenna.org> In-Reply-To: <200307272011.51631.eu@marcelopenna.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307280953.34933.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 750 Lines: 15 On Monday 28 July 2003 00:11, Marcelo Penna Guerra wrote: > No luck here, Jeff ... if the hardware is really based on AMD8111 as it > appears to be (i2c and ide are similar), they surelly changed more > registers. It'll take some time to RE it. Hmm, If they had licensed it, I don't see why they would have changed the registers that much; they didn't for the other hardware they licensed. Judging by the size of nvnetlib.o, there isn't really that much to it (which is nice from an RE point of view) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/