Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265069AbTG1K1K (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 06:27:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265624AbTG1K1K (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 06:27:10 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:28551 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265069AbTG1K1H (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 06:27:07 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: mru@users.sourceforge.net (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Subject: Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:37:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1059211833.576.13.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> <20030726101015.GA3922@eugeneteo.net> <3F2264DF.7060306@wmich.edu> <200307271046.30318.phillips@arcor.de> <20030726113522.447578d8.akpm@osdl.org> <20030727010153.7e2e0d48.diegocg@teleline.es> <1059385080.574.0.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:EHM8s9haTy909eTnpNzOFighoIk= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 712 Lines: 17 Felipe Alfaro Solana writes: >> > It is interesting that Felipe says that stock 2.5.69 was the best CPU >> > scheduler of the 2.5 series. Do others agree with that? > >> No. >> For me, 2.5.63 was the best. Or perhaps it was .64 or .65? > > Well, for me now, the best scheduler is 2.6.0-test2 plus Con's O10 > patch. Could someone give a brief comparison between Con's O10int and Ingo's G7 patches? -- M?ns Rullg?rd mru@users.sf.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/