Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262439AbTG1MD3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 08:03:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263187AbTG1MD3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 08:03:29 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:61863 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262439AbTG1MD3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 08:03:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:18:44 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Lou Langholtz Cc: linux-kernel , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.6.0-test2] get rid of unused request_queue field queue_wait Message-ID: <20030728121844.GE25356@suse.de> References: <3F24D8B8.5030107@aros.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F24D8B8.5030107@aros.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 729 Lines: 18 On Mon, Jul 28 2003, Lou Langholtz wrote: > Are we going to use the queue_wait field of struct request_queue > someday? As of 2.6.0-test2, I don't see any use of it. If it's not > needed anymore, the following patch gets rid of it. Tested this patch by > compiling for i386 and also doing a grep through all .h and .c files to > see if it's used somewhere else (admittedly weak). It's a relic from before dynamic request allocation, for now it can definitely go. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/