Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <1517397409.3452.7.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] hv_netvsc: Split netvsc_revoke_buf() and
 netvsc_teardown_gpadl()
From:   Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@redhat.com>
Reply-To: mgamal@redhat.com
To:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, otubo@redhat.com, sthemmin@microsoft.com,
        haiyangz@microsoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devel@linuxdriverproject.org, vkuznets@redhat.com
Date:   Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:16:49 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20180130112926.53f3c166@xeon-e3>
References: <1516700045-32142-1-git-send-email-mgamal@redhat.com>
         <1516700045-32142-2-git-send-email-mgamal@redhat.com>
         <20180130112926.53f3c166@xeon-e3>
Organization: Red Hat
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 11:29 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 10:34:04 +0100
> Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Split each of the functions into two for each of send/recv buffers
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@redhat.com>
> 
> Splitting these functions is not necessary

How so? We need to send each message independently, and hence the split
(see cover letter). Is there another way?