Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269555AbTG1NFh (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:05:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269557AbTG1NFg (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:05:36 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:41912 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269555AbTG1NFc (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:05:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:20:45 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Lou Langholtz Cc: linux-kernel , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.6.0-test2] get rid of unused request_queue field queue_wait Message-ID: <20030728132045.GF25356@suse.de> References: <3F24D8B8.5030107@aros.net> <20030728121844.GE25356@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030728121844.GE25356@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 921 Lines: 22 On Mon, Jul 28 2003, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28 2003, Lou Langholtz wrote: > > Are we going to use the queue_wait field of struct request_queue > > someday? As of 2.6.0-test2, I don't see any use of it. If it's not > > needed anymore, the following patch gets rid of it. Tested this patch by > > compiling for i386 and also doing a grep through all .h and .c files to > > see if it's used somewhere else (admittedly weak). > > It's a relic from before dynamic request allocation, for now it can > definitely go. Eh sorry, still very much jet lagged. It has nothing to do with request allocation. The point still stands though, it can be removed. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/