Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269958AbTG1PPf (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:15:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269981AbTG1PPf (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:15:35 -0400 Received: from coral.ocn.ne.jp ([211.6.83.180]:37599 "EHLO smtp.coral.ocn.ne.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269958AbTG1PPe (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:15:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:30:46 +0900 From: Bruce Harada To: Meelis Roos Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: raid5 autoselecting a slower checksum function Message-Id: <20030729003046.15975639.bharada@coral.ocn.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 510 Lines: 15 On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:17:00 +0300 (EEST) Meelis Roos wrote: > Why doesn't it select p5_mmx if it is 37% faster than pIII_sse? This has come up before - see : http://hypermail.idiosynkrasia.net/linux-kernel/archived/2003/week01/1894.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/