Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp3146954wra; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 11:31:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226beQkiLIqFXiJb6DFWXfCzDR4iHmZYWecwlqe/i0q3Be++CQuL/Lf8oWNeZSb5HLgdn16O X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6e8c:: with SMTP id v12-v6mr33478362plk.14.1517513485590; Thu, 01 Feb 2018 11:31:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517513485; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aPC5lp8xAfOYyxWxpX7dLg1Dfs35SFJSxUGaXA1lT1EiKFquNl/w+K3flqntveuyFH W5TqDc0+Qyt/VQoc4/H1WrIES3e0BS6QqeRTwiCCadwR35NWZIW2q7qkT2nZYmU4kxXF EkT3S/pfxYa4SDi/FnBRTWJB3xHTs6G+1zVVlIK8/S0HSIorFddWRHjpaToLrUanpQtl xb7Etm6/nRNx47cXUAWfR1IRmm3PQlZ5Ieh2WXb7Zz0HrwGBuxCn+jX1OGrROEFVU72o ilEpuVD+3hAmaQfiU/NPmyUMs0oahBA0anHYQwY6xlZjS2uNU5PgHUU3cHmqrLL7pjuW /z6A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dmarc-filter:arc-authentication-results; bh=kq7BbRbpjVlTsHOZJkh7FlD4H+eoU/ksjvNdZqs739g=; b=Wp6MSYUUyBqDn7P+UqNFUBGNi0eKjxVRhyE8tB7aVqQ+bBt2QEQSewn3vtVVVRBZea G2ct2CeonlkWc8AVOeWPB0oSI15HRPXtG76e46osN4VJSgBQ+P4qQMc4rwsgD70gH9pe snUmpHujAv8pxzNox1ngQuj8ZRULx+boGQOmgodTZLKSXmtPOSIVZ2a5PhAPWasEs/IW OWT6ON03FwKx0kF/xdu+f/3tWmmdpJl8ayp4vjeUnRSQR095No+41DrYcnOd/I9RfVQm fGlH+ZB11uUkOUkosXI1U0DSdyHE1Jhyh+xT62IeV/yP3wYW2tezCeaOCtsFCNGawpjG uukg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l63si170863pge.147.2018.02.01.11.31.10; Thu, 01 Feb 2018 11:31:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754624AbeBATBM (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 1 Feb 2018 14:01:12 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56188 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752292AbeBATBD (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2018 14:01:03 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [69.71.4.159]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0460C2178E; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 19:01:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0460C2178E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=helgaas@kernel.org Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 13:00:33 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Niklas Cassel Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Bjorn Helgaas , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Cyrille Pitchen , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci tree Message-ID: <20180201190033.GB63412@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> References: <20180201105114.562aef46@canb.auug.org.au> <20180201085608.GA22568@axis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180201085608.GA22568@axis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [+cc Kishon, linux-pci] On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:56:09AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 10:51:14AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Bjorn, > > > > After merging the pci tree, today's linux-next build (arm > > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > > > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c: In function 'dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq': > > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c:293:8: error: too few arguments to function 'dw_pcie_ep_map_addr' > > ret = dw_pcie_ep_map_addr(epc, ep->msi_mem_phys, msg_addr, > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c:177:12: note: declared here > > static int dw_pcie_ep_map_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c:300:2: error: too few arguments to function 'dw_pcie_ep_unmap_addr' > > dw_pcie_ep_unmap_addr(epc, ep->msi_mem_phys); > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c:161:13: note: declared here > > static void dw_pcie_ep_unmap_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > Caused by commit > > > > 4494738de0d9 ("PCI: endpoint: Add the function number as argument to EPC ops") > > > > interacting with commit > > > > 6f6d7873711c ("PCI: designware-ep: Add generic function for raising MSI irq") > > > > This should have been fixed up in commit > > > > 26b259ab4fe8 ("Merge remote-tracking branch 'lorenzo/pci/dwc' into next") > > > > I have used the pci tree from next-20180131 for today. > > Hello, > > A suggested merge resolution included as an attachment. I applied this resolution to the merge of lorenzo/pci/dwc. > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c > index 39e4a9744863..ed8558d638e5 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c > @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static void dra7xx_pcie_raise_msi_irq(struct dra7xx_pcie *dra7xx, > dra7xx_pcie_writel(dra7xx, PCIECTRL_TI_CONF_MSI_XMT, reg); > } > > -static int dra7xx_pcie_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, > +static int dra7xx_pcie_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, > enum pci_epc_irq_type type, u8 interrupt_num) > { > struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c > index 34ae163603ee..93b3df9ed1b5 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c > @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static void artpec6_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) > dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar); > } > > -static int artpec6_pcie_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, > +static int artpec6_pcie_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, > enum pci_epc_irq_type type, u8 interrupt_num) > { > struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); > @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int artpec6_pcie_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, > dev_err(pci->dev, "EP cannot trigger legacy IRQs\n"); > return -EINVAL; > case PCI_EPC_IRQ_MSI: > - return dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(ep, interrupt_num); > + return dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(ep, func_no, interrupt_num); > default: > dev_err(pci->dev, "UNKNOWN IRQ type\n"); > } > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c > index c0395e1f470a..3a6feeff5f5b 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c > @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, > if (!ep->ops->raise_irq) > return -EINVAL; > > - return ep->ops->raise_irq(ep, type, interrupt_num); > + return ep->ops->raise_irq(ep, func_no, type, interrupt_num); > } > > static void dw_pcie_ep_stop(struct pci_epc *epc) > @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static const struct pci_epc_ops epc_ops = { > .stop = dw_pcie_ep_stop, > }; > > -int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, > +int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, > u8 interrupt_num) > { > struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); > @@ -290,14 +290,14 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, > msg_data = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, MSI_MESSAGE_DATA_32); > } > msg_addr = ((u64) msg_addr_upper) << 32 | msg_addr_lower; > - ret = dw_pcie_ep_map_addr(epc, ep->msi_mem_phys, msg_addr, > + ret = dw_pcie_ep_map_addr(epc, func_no, ep->msi_mem_phys, msg_addr, > epc->mem->page_size); > if (ret) > return ret; > > writel(msg_data | (interrupt_num - 1), ep->msi_mem); > > - dw_pcie_ep_unmap_addr(epc, ep->msi_mem_phys); > + dw_pcie_ep_unmap_addr(epc, func_no, ep->msi_mem_phys); > > return 0; > } > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h > index 7e52119f0e96..11b13864a406 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h > @@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ enum dw_pcie_as_type { > > struct dw_pcie_ep_ops { > void (*ep_init)(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep); > - int (*raise_irq)(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, enum pci_epc_irq_type type, > - u8 interrupt_num); > + int (*raise_irq)(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, > + enum pci_epc_irq_type type, u8 interrupt_num); > }; > > struct dw_pcie_ep { > @@ -342,7 +342,8 @@ static inline int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) > void dw_pcie_ep_linkup(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep); > int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep); > void dw_pcie_ep_exit(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep); > -int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 interrupt_num); > +int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, > + u8 interrupt_num); > void dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(struct dw_pcie *pci, enum pci_barno bar); > #else > static inline void dw_pcie_ep_linkup(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) > @@ -358,7 +359,7 @@ static inline void dw_pcie_ep_exit(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) > { > } > > -static inline int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, > +static inline int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, > u8 interrupt_num) > { > return 0;