Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp3287874wra; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 14:02:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227hzbPW5Cts+Ve4hMm6f+rkCe3tugZGta74BphnO/+KaJzD+Z2yfJLeAxPR96iS4K4SAilj X-Received: by 10.101.102.73 with SMTP id z9mr5700629pgv.448.1517522571241; Thu, 01 Feb 2018 14:02:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517522571; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IZJ7JqHRE52UiWxj8AupxcU9cvaSC0qWa0dZQshwf5S7TmbBj1jEyD83PMhh2UCu6K eBzuA1nCbFLm0KCn1EJnfNg62ia6CdT1SgBIQ1BElZPeYHIoI1ZKcUJWmnBjpL/ax/nG +hj/XcdrYMrcgh2iICz7LZl/i8EwFIwDusLwWQ99DSbZfscgxAFel0Xud62bgE9yZhGH 6IL6MLJPwc/dsbktDhDQ6yWqfky8vmBGwmgH6XXdrF1+NF7I2PD9fC8VAkHh6Yqq4ZI0 1v1Ys0lELllZ5ci3IgHH94bUpfj1YrHsxqvAug19Q8auujaGzVf9d1RVIo6iub0LDAaJ Xyqw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dmarc-filter :arc-authentication-results; bh=RZqNNaimkT1gkkg1IYtdmMeIuwu98TOmmyCAFXNjRxU=; b=E4mQ2BP5gzEj64SSxyAAnPv2w0RKAlptSmI5iFNXhgn+pi/r2IhDTNCx2ebuVi/Mhd Pz0MKkslrDdMnkonKue+2//iG6cepxaU26BdRSr91tEAMUGRGex61efv1pUjp4bMGWXO fGtEOHM+npPtCPpDJn4ISdFJ04d78JXQyj75rCaNscFCuZux/Fo+0PXfE+od8O9bxNLy R9rko+b84AMrkOOFJWvoRLJW5N5x1XiP8tysJKn662YPcPRmrZB1GmFD6T6OOouAAe8l EI2B7oLbIRk2sbJXBTX4EkVUSfsYXahE7EsAIVsaL0BP1fDkeG/33QsxFfUq2YImaMio bIUQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b3-v6si450844pls.325.2018.02.01.14.02.36; Thu, 01 Feb 2018 14:02:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752336AbeBAWBa (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 1 Feb 2018 17:01:30 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41482 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752288AbeBAWBS (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2018 17:01:18 -0500 Received: from mail-ua0-f176.google.com (mail-ua0-f176.google.com [209.85.217.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6C79217A5; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 22:01:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E6C79217A5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=atull@kernel.org Received: by mail-ua0-f176.google.com with SMTP id q8so12914671uae.4; Thu, 01 Feb 2018 14:01:17 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdIXsQhdxiWCEUzRFFUeA6JFNFYSp5pGkv9L5kdVUNk/yyvGbaN BDsTTkLa+NdQgwwh8bcjLMJ6h0J7QlIG2V7DDdA= X-Received: by 10.159.33.179 with SMTP id 48mr752802uac.182.1517522476750; Thu, 01 Feb 2018 14:01:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.60.79 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 14:00:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1511764948-20972-15-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com> References: <1511764948-20972-1-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com> <1511764948-20972-15-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com> From: Alan Tull Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:00:36 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/21] fpga: dfl: add fpga manager platform driver for FME To: Wu Hao Cc: Moritz Fischer , linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, "Kang, Luwei" , "Zhang, Yi Z" , Tim Whisonant , Enno Luebbers , Shiva Rao , Christopher Rauer , Xiao Guangrong Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:42 AM, Wu Hao wrote: Hi Hao, A few comments below. Besides that, looks good. > This patch adds fpga manager driver for FPGA Management Engine (FME). It > implements fpga_manager_ops for FPGA Partial Reconfiguration function. > > Signed-off-by: Tim Whisonant > Signed-off-by: Enno Luebbers > Signed-off-by: Shiva Rao > Signed-off-by: Christopher Rauer > Signed-off-by: Kang Luwei > Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong > Signed-off-by: Wu Hao > ---- > v3: rename driver to dfl-fpga-fme-mgr > implemented status callback for fpga manager > rebased due to fpga api changes > --- > .../ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-fpga-dfl-fme-mgr | 8 + > drivers/fpga/Kconfig | 6 + > drivers/fpga/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/fpga/fpga-dfl-fme-mgr.c | 318 +++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/fpga/fpga-dfl.h | 39 ++- > 5 files changed, 371 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-fpga-dfl-fme-mgr > create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/fpga-dfl-fme-mgr.c > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-fpga-dfl-fme-mgr b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-fpga-dfl-fme-mgr > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..2d4f917 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-fpga-dfl-fme-mgr > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ > +What: /sys/bus/platform/devices/fpga-dfl-fme-mgr.0/interface_id > +Date: November 2017 > +KernelVersion: 4.15 > +Contact: Wu Hao > +Description: Read-only. It returns interface id of partial reconfiguration > + hardware. Userspace could use this information to check if > + current hardware is compatible with given image before FPGA > + programming. I'm a little confused by this. I can understand that the PR bitstream has a dependency on the FPGA's static image, but I don't understand the dependency of the bistream on the hardware that is used to program the bitstream to the FPGA. > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig > index 57da904..0171ecb 100644 > --- a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig > @@ -150,6 +150,12 @@ config FPGA_DFL_FME > FPGA platform level management features. There shall be 1 FME > per DFL based FPGA device. > > +config FPGA_DFL_FME_MGR > + tristate "FPGA DFL FME Manager Driver" > + depends on FPGA_DFL_FME > + help > + Say Y to enable FPGA Manager driver for FPGA Management Engine. > + > config INTEL_FPGA_DFL_PCI > tristate "Intel FPGA DFL PCIe Device Driver" > depends on PCI && FPGA_DFL > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/Makefile > index cc75bb3..6378580 100644 > --- a/drivers/fpga/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/fpga/Makefile > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_FPGA_REGION) += of-fpga-region.o > # FPGA Device Feature List Support > obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL) += fpga-dfl.o > obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME) += fpga-dfl-fme.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME_MGR) += fpga-dfl-fme-mgr.o > > fpga-dfl-fme-objs := dfl-fme-main.o dfl-fme-pr.o > > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-dfl-fme-mgr.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-dfl-fme-mgr.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..70356ce > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/fpga/fpga-dfl-fme-mgr.c > @@ -0,0 +1,318 @@ > +/* > + * FPGA Manager Driver for FPGA Management Engine (FME) > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation, Inc. > + * > + * Authors: > + * Kang Luwei > + * Xiao Guangrong > + * Wu Hao > + * Joseph Grecco > + * Enno Luebbers > + * Tim Whisonant > + * Ananda Ravuri > + * Christopher Rauer > + * Henry Mitchel > + * > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL version 2. > + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > + */ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include "fpga-dfl.h" > +#include "dfl-fme.h" > + > +#define PR_WAIT_TIMEOUT 8000000 > +#define PR_HOST_STATUS_IDLE 0 > + > +struct fme_mgr_priv { > + void __iomem *ioaddr; > + u64 pr_error; > +}; > + > +static ssize_t interface_id_show(struct device *dev, > + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) > +{ > + struct fpga_manager *mgr = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + struct fme_mgr_priv *priv = mgr->priv; > + u64 intfc_id_l, intfc_id_h; > + > + intfc_id_l = readq(priv->ioaddr + FME_PR_INTFC_ID_L); > + intfc_id_h = readq(priv->ioaddr + FME_PR_INTFC_ID_H); > + > + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%016llx%016llx\n", > + (unsigned long long)intfc_id_h, > + (unsigned long long)intfc_id_l); > +} > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(interface_id); > + > +static const struct attribute *fme_mgr_attrs[] = { > + &dev_attr_interface_id.attr, > + NULL, > +}; > + > +static u64 pr_error_to_mgr_status(u64 err) > +{ > + u64 status = 0; > + > + if (err & FME_PR_ERR_OPERATION_ERR) > + status |= FPGA_MGR_STATUS_OPERATION_ERR; > + if (err & FME_PR_ERR_CRC_ERR) > + status |= FPGA_MGR_STATUS_CRC_ERR; > + if (err & FME_PR_ERR_INCOMPATIBLE_BS) > + status |= FPGA_MGR_STATUS_INCOMPATIBLE_IMAGE_ERR; > + if (err & FME_PR_ERR_PROTOCOL_ERR) > + status |= FPGA_MGR_STATUS_IP_PROTOCOL_ERR; > + if (err & FME_PR_ERR_FIFO_OVERFLOW) > + status |= FPGA_MGR_STATUS_FIFO_OVERFLOW_ERR; > + > + return status; > +} > + > +static u64 fme_mgr_pr_error_handle(void __iomem *fme_pr) > +{ > + u64 pr_status, pr_error; > + > + pr_status = readq(fme_pr + FME_PR_STS); > + if (!(pr_status & FME_PR_STS_PR_STS)) > + return 0; > + > + pr_error = readq(fme_pr + FME_PR_ERR); > + writeq(pr_error, fme_pr + FME_PR_ERR); > + > + return pr_error; > +} > + > +static int fme_mgr_write_init(struct fpga_manager *mgr, > + struct fpga_image_info *info, > + const char *buf, size_t count) > +{ > + struct device *dev = &mgr->dev; > + struct fme_mgr_priv *priv = mgr->priv; > + void __iomem *fme_pr = priv->ioaddr; > + u64 pr_ctrl, pr_status; > + > + if (!(info->flags & FPGA_MGR_PARTIAL_RECONFIG)) { > + dev_err(dev, "only support partial reconfiguration.\n"); supports > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "resetting PR before initiated PR\n"); > + > + pr_ctrl = readq(fme_pr + FME_PR_CTRL); > + pr_ctrl |= FME_PR_CTRL_PR_RST; > + writeq(pr_ctrl, fme_pr + FME_PR_CTRL); > + > + if (readq_poll_timeout(fme_pr + FME_PR_CTRL, pr_ctrl, > + pr_ctrl & FME_PR_CTRL_PR_RSTACK, 1, > + PR_WAIT_TIMEOUT)) { > + dev_err(dev, "maximum PR timeout\n"); We have two dev_err's with the same "maximum PR timeout" so the user would not be able to see at which point the timeout occurred. I suggest to get rid of the word 'maximum' for both. This one could be 'reset ack timeout" or something similar. > + return -ETIMEDOUT; > + } > + > + pr_ctrl = readq(fme_pr + FME_PR_CTRL); > + pr_ctrl &= ~FME_PR_CTRL_PR_RST; > + writeq(pr_ctrl, fme_pr + FME_PR_CTRL); > + > + dev_dbg(dev, > + "waiting for PR resource in HW to be initialized and ready\n"); > + > + if (readq_poll_timeout(fme_pr + FME_PR_STS, pr_status, > + (pr_status & FME_PR_STS_PR_STS) == > + FME_PR_STS_PR_STS_IDLE, 1, PR_WAIT_TIMEOUT)) { > + dev_err(dev, "maximum PR timeout\n"); "PR_STS timeout"? Or something better. > + priv->pr_error = fme_mgr_pr_error_handle(fme_pr); > + return -ETIMEDOUT; > + } > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "check and clear previous PR error\n"); > + priv->pr_error = fme_mgr_pr_error_handle(fme_pr); > + if (priv->pr_error) > + dev_dbg(dev, "previous PR error detected %llx\n", > + (unsigned long long)priv->pr_error); > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "set PR port ID\n"); > + > + pr_ctrl = readq(fme_pr + FME_PR_CTRL); > + pr_ctrl &= ~FME_PR_CTRL_PR_RGN_ID; > + pr_ctrl |= FIELD_PREP(FME_PR_CTRL_PR_RGN_ID, info->region_id); > + writeq(pr_ctrl, fme_pr + FME_PR_CTRL); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int fme_mgr_write(struct fpga_manager *mgr, > + const char *buf, size_t count) > +{ > + struct device *dev = &mgr->dev; > + struct fme_mgr_priv *priv = mgr->priv; > + void __iomem *fme_pr = priv->ioaddr; > + u64 pr_ctrl, pr_status, pr_data; > + int delay = 0, pr_credit, i = 0; > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "start request\n"); > + > + pr_ctrl = readq(fme_pr + FME_PR_CTRL); > + pr_ctrl |= FME_PR_CTRL_PR_START; > + writeq(pr_ctrl, fme_pr + FME_PR_CTRL); > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "pushing data from bitstream to HW\n"); > + > + pr_status = readq(fme_pr + FME_PR_STS); > + pr_credit = FIELD_GET(FME_PR_STS_PR_CREDIT, pr_status); > + > + while (count > 0) { > + while (pr_credit <= 1) { > + if (delay++ > PR_WAIT_TIMEOUT) { > + dev_err(dev, "maximum try\n"); It looks like this is waiting for an entry in a queue and timing out here. Could you add a some comments for pr_credit above and this loop? Also a better error message, perhaps "PR credit timeout"? > + return -ETIMEDOUT; > + } > + udelay(1); > + > + pr_status = readq(fme_pr + FME_PR_STS); > + pr_credit = FIELD_GET(FME_PR_STS_PR_CREDIT, pr_status); > + } > + > + if (count >= 4) { > + pr_data = 0; > + pr_data |= FIELD_PREP(FME_PR_DATA_PR_DATA_RAW, > + *(((u32 *)buf) + i)); > + writeq(pr_data, fme_pr + FME_PR_DATA); > + count -= 4; > + pr_credit--; > + i++; > + } else { > + WARN_ON(1); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int fme_mgr_write_complete(struct fpga_manager *mgr, > + struct fpga_image_info *info) > +{ > + struct device *dev = &mgr->dev; > + struct fme_mgr_priv *priv = mgr->priv; > + void __iomem *fme_pr = priv->ioaddr; > + u64 pr_ctrl; > + > + pr_ctrl = readq(fme_pr + FME_PR_CTRL); > + pr_ctrl |= FME_PR_CTRL_PR_COMPLETE; > + writeq(pr_ctrl, fme_pr + FME_PR_CTRL); > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "green bitstream push complete\n"); > + dev_dbg(dev, "waiting for HW to release PR resource\n"); > + > + if (readq_poll_timeout(fme_pr + FME_PR_CTRL, pr_ctrl, > + !(pr_ctrl & FME_PR_CTRL_PR_START), 1, > + PR_WAIT_TIMEOUT)) { > + dev_err(dev, "maximum try.\n"); Some message specific to here also, please. > + return -ETIMEDOUT; > + } > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "PR operation complete, checking status\n"); > + priv->pr_error = fme_mgr_pr_error_handle(fme_pr); > + if (priv->pr_error) { > + dev_dbg(dev, "PR error detected %llx\n", > + (unsigned long long)priv->pr_error); > + return -EIO; > + } > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "PR done successfully\n"); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static enum fpga_mgr_states fme_mgr_state(struct fpga_manager *mgr) > +{ > + return FPGA_MGR_STATE_UNKNOWN; > +} > + > +static u64 fme_mgr_status(struct fpga_manager *mgr) > +{ > + struct fme_mgr_priv *priv = mgr->priv; > + > + return pr_error_to_mgr_status(priv->pr_error); > +} > + > +static const struct fpga_manager_ops fme_mgr_ops = { > + .write_init = fme_mgr_write_init, > + .write = fme_mgr_write, > + .write_complete = fme_mgr_write_complete, > + .state = fme_mgr_state, > + .status = fme_mgr_status, > +}; > + > +static int fme_mgr_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct fme_mgr_priv *priv; > + struct fpga_manager *mgr; > + struct resource *res; > + int ret; > + > + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!priv) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > + priv->ioaddr = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res)); > + if (IS_ERR(priv->ioaddr)) > + return PTR_ERR(priv->ioaddr); > + > + ret = sysfs_create_files(&pdev->dev.kobj, fme_mgr_attrs); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + mgr = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mgr), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!mgr) > + goto sysfs_remove_exit; > + > + mgr->name = "DFL FPGA Manager"; > + mgr->mops = &fme_mgr_ops; > + mgr->priv = priv; > + mgr->parent = dev; > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mgr); > + > + ret = fpga_mgr_register(mgr); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "unable to register FPGA manager\n"); > + goto sysfs_remove_exit; > + } > + > + return 0; > + > +sysfs_remove_exit: > + sysfs_remove_files(&pdev->dev.kobj, fme_mgr_attrs); > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int fme_mgr_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct fpga_manager *mgr = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + > + fpga_mgr_unregister(mgr); > + sysfs_remove_files(&pdev->dev.kobj, fme_mgr_attrs); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static struct platform_driver fme_mgr_driver = { > + .driver = { > + .name = FPGA_DFL_FME_MGR, > + }, > + .probe = fme_mgr_probe, > + .remove = fme_mgr_remove, > +}; > + > +module_platform_driver(fme_mgr_driver); > + > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("FPGA Manager for FPGA Management Engine"); > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation"); > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:fpga-dfl-fme-mgr"); > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-dfl.h b/drivers/fpga/fpga-dfl.h > index e5a1094..d45eb82 100644 > --- a/drivers/fpga/fpga-dfl.h > +++ b/drivers/fpga/fpga-dfl.h > @@ -130,7 +130,44 @@ > > /* FME Partial Reconfiguration Sub Feature Register Set */ > #define FME_PR_DFH DFH > -#define FME_PR_SIZE DFH_SIZE > +#define FME_PR_CTRL 0x8 > +#define FME_PR_STS 0x10 > +#define FME_PR_DATA 0x18 > +#define FME_PR_ERR 0x20 > +#define FME_PR_INTFC_ID_H 0xA8 > +#define FME_PR_INTFC_ID_L 0xB0 > +#define FME_PR_SIZE 0xB8 > + > +/* FME PR Control Register Bitfield */ > +#define FME_PR_CTRL_PR_RST BIT(0) /* Reset PR engine */ > +#define FME_PR_CTRL_PR_RSTACK BIT(4) /* Ack for PR engine reset */ > +#define FME_PR_CTRL_PR_RGN_ID GENMASK_ULL(9, 7) /* PR Region ID */ > +#define FME_PR_CTRL_PR_START BIT(12) /* Start to request for PR service */ > +#define FME_PR_CTRL_PR_COMPLETE BIT(13) /* PR data push complete notification */ > + > +/* FME PR Status Register Bitfield */ > +/* Number of available entries in HW queue inside the PR engine. */ > +#define FME_PR_STS_PR_CREDIT GENMASK_ULL(8, 0) > +#define FME_PR_STS_PR_STS BIT(16) /* PR operation status */ > +#define FME_PR_STS_PR_STS_IDLE 0 > +#define FME_PR_STS_PR_CTRLR_STS GENMASK_ULL(22, 20) /* Controller status */ > +#define FME_PR_STS_PR_HOST_STS GENMASK_ULL(27, 24) /* PR host status */ > + > +/* FME PR Data Register Bitfield */ > +/* PR data from the raw-binary file. */ > +#define FME_PR_DATA_PR_DATA_RAW GENMASK_ULL(32, 0) > + > +/* FME PR Error Register */ > +/* Previous PR Operation errors detected. */ > +#define FME_PR_ERR_OPERATION_ERR BIT(0) > +/* CRC error detected. */ > +#define FME_PR_ERR_CRC_ERR BIT(1) > +/* Incompatible PR bitstream detected. */ > +#define FME_PR_ERR_INCOMPATIBLE_BS BIT(2) > +/* PR data push protocol violated. */ > +#define FME_PR_ERR_PROTOCOL_ERR BIT(3) > +/* PR data fifo overflow error detected */ > +#define FME_PR_ERR_FIFO_OVERFLOW BIT(4) > > /* FME HSSI Sub Feature Register Set */ > #define FME_HSSI_DFH DFH I see fpga-dfl.h as enumeration code which is separate from any driver implementation specifics other than what's required for the DFL enumeration scheme. These PR engine #defines should move to a .h that is dedicated to this specific PR hardware device. If someone else adds a different PR device to the framework, their PR driver would also have its own .h. Same for any other modules that aren't central to DFL enumeration. Thanks, Alan > -- > 1.8.3.1 >