Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S130176AbRCHWru>; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 17:47:50 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S130187AbRCHWrl>; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 17:47:41 -0500
Received: from mailg.telia.com ([194.22.194.26]:14609 "EHLO mailg.telia.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S130176AbRCHWra>;
	Thu, 8 Mar 2001 17:47:30 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Roger Larsson <roger.larsson@norran.net>
To: "Paul Larson" <plars@us.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel stress testing coverage
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 23:37:55 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
In-Reply-To: <OF50B88864.0721DA46-ON85256A09.006EE3FD@raleigh.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF50B88864.0721DA46-ON85256A09.006EE3FD@raleigh.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01030823375501.03048@dox>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

Here is a link to some memory usage related test programs:

  http://carpanta.dc.fi.udc.es/~quintela/memtest/

They have proven their value many times...


/RogerL

On Thursday 08 March 2001 21:57, Paul Larson wrote:
> Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> on 03/08/2001 02:06:06 PM
>
> To:   Paul Larson/Austin/IBM@ibmus
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: Kernel stress testing coverage
>
> >One thing I've been using for coverage (at least some coverage) is the
>
> posix
>
> >test suite
>
> --------------------------
>
> Are you talking about the same posix test suite that LSB is using?  I've
> looked into that a little, but here are the two problems I'm wanting to
> address:
>
> 1. How much of the kernel is getting hit on a run of any given test?  Even
> an approximate percentage is fine as long as I can prove it.
>
> 2. I could run many many copies simultaneously I suppose and get some
> stress, but I'd prefer to stress individual pieces one at a time.  Those
> pieces could then be mixed together in later runs for mixed load stress.
> Additional mixed load tests will be performed with general applications
> (web servers, databases, etc) for more of a "real world" environment, but I
> want to have focused tests as well.
>
> I'm betting that there are probably a LOT of quick and dirty test programs
> that kernel hackers have written to expose a problem or thoroughly test a
> piece of the kernel that they modified.  These type of things would be
> FYI this project will be going on sourceforge very soon.  I want to have a
> little more to start out with though and finish putting together a good
> project description, testplans, etc. to post as soon as we put it on there.
> I hate it when people start projects and you don't see any good information
> about it for weeks.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul Larson
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Home page:
  none currently
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/