Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271071AbTG1Uz5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:55:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271107AbTG1UzU (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:55:20 -0400 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([213.168.176.16]:54146 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271071AbTG1Uy6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:54:58 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:54:38 +0200 From: Tomas Szepe To: Bruce Harada Cc: Meelis Roos , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: raid5 autoselecting a slower checksum function Message-ID: <20030728205438.GI32673@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <20030729003046.15975639.bharada@coral.ocn.ne.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030729003046.15975639.bharada@coral.ocn.ne.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 771 Lines: 24 > [bharada@coral.ocn.ne.jp] > > On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:17:00 +0300 (EEST) > Meelis Roos wrote: > > > > > Why doesn't it select p5_mmx if it is 37% faster than pIII_sse? > > This has come up before - see : > > http://hypermail.idiosynkrasia.net/linux-kernel/archived/2003/week01/1894.html Fair enough, but wouldn't it be more appropriate if the kernel printed a message like "SSE present, good. No need to try the other checksumming methods" in this case? -- Tomas Szepe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/