Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp820728wra; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 06:41:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224Fs8uZ0LsrJe3MRMSFUgWI3aodV2DRo6kmo8T5fi0tKZFW2/7Aq50XZymA5V8ifpvPENCa X-Received: by 10.99.103.129 with SMTP id b123mr3130376pgc.177.1517582489912; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 06:41:29 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517582489; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xgE29xTEZ1WX0ALffIKIe/G//07fTUDBTcGb0IXyAGwGNEiFAXmNSDTgV2DZoE8dhO mhYznzXHt7fkwHtT3OjwjcdUoNBvOtnmaJaePkDfGKHibtPnuf3AlCR6Dy1kmnjN29ks 2cma/p7A0vCwywsgJVhTTqJDxjTeFz6YvwOHJO6YlFdTS6Z4n8pRPQ37LIqLmlXQJwmo ZvW4HeUOAHil0YRpSjdpfOoHV+2q+BO4kiPmz0d57z5XisTad7MnrDGz6pPn5A+qTPQw aMAobdSRJ7RL/iSABtfFMqDu1nMfHU8XJPt5ZrKl2PBBvrOVQA+RotX4OgV7Yxf4l5e5 Hnmg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=BGukyrSG+Cyqy4ABVQlEUQWJWGLEZKrizitlmGhVtnU=; b=Ir8dwAme7ufyPoFs8PRvYS2kHUq8GgVhRcQOl0zFyVWGq3lIXZDSMkOepGNLDqyBat GTJ6jaOox6LKgtIZhJy8Eg2sFomb7E7LRGVjwVK0dDZKC7rKtCczgRwGow+3gqF5ppWS sq4ZCMTopW73uJGTOFC2v3k3iVUTVWHXuIdaDFA68Q7G5PRJwjCQ6tYnHyEdL50Mx23o X4wJLz5vHoM47tqPhuYQNSD9zGT0e4UKLmOhAzQTuhbgeGJuR6pUU/3lebua+Es72947 Lh6FxeoEY5FauIiVBYB3PIhFCAX3qqK6WcIPqPkGExVAabzzldBbYON44JmHPjola01e bWrg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z16si1897466pfg.325.2018.02.02.06.41.15; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 06:41:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752180AbeBBOkZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:40:25 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:47852 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751629AbeBBOkS (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:40:18 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w12EdOnc092061 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:40:17 -0500 Received: from e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.107]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2fvps508fe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 09:40:16 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 14:40:15 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.141) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 14:40:11 -0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w12EeAZj66322544; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 14:40:10 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383DA42042; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 14:33:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DDF42041; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 14:33:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.145.24.118] (unknown [9.145.24.118]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 14:33:13 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 12/13] mm: split up release_pages into non-sentinel and sentinel passes To: daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: aaron.lu@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Dave.Dice@oracle.com, dave@stgolabs.net, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mgorman@suse.de, mhocko@kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@oracle.com, steven.sistare@oracle.com, yossi.lev@oracle.com References: <20180131230413.27653-1-daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> <20180131230413.27653-13-daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> From: Laurent Dufour Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 15:40:09 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180131230413.27653-13-daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18020214-0040-0000-0000-0000042BD1FE X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18020214-0041-0000-0000-000020CF774D Message-Id: <3287f5ca-ab17-6437-c0fd-b867d90f8c1f@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-02-02_04:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1802020180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/02/2018 00:04, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com wrote: > A common case in release_pages is for the 'pages' list to be in roughly > the same order as they are in their LRU. With LRU batch locking, when a > sentinel page is removed, an adjacent non-sentinel page must be promoted > to a sentinel page to follow the locking scheme. So we can get behavior > where nearly every page in the 'pages' array is treated as a sentinel > page, hurting the scalability of this approach. > > To address this, split up release_pages into non-sentinel and sentinel > passes so that the non-sentinel pages can be locked with an LRU batch > lock before the sentinel pages are removed. > > For the prototype, just use a bitmap and a temporary outer loop to > implement this. > > Performance numbers from a single microbenchmark at this point in the > series are included in the next patch. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Jordan > --- > mm/swap.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c > index fae766e035a4..a302224293ad 100644 > --- a/mm/swap.c > +++ b/mm/swap.c > @@ -731,6 +731,7 @@ void lru_add_drain_all(void) > put_online_cpus(); > } > > +#define LRU_BITMAP_SIZE 512 > /** > * release_pages - batched put_page() > * @pages: array of pages to release > @@ -742,16 +743,32 @@ void lru_add_drain_all(void) > */ > void release_pages(struct page **pages, int nr) > { > - int i; > + int h, i; > LIST_HEAD(pages_to_free); > struct pglist_data *locked_pgdat = NULL; > spinlock_t *locked_lru_batch = NULL; > struct lruvec *lruvec; > unsigned long uninitialized_var(flags); > + DECLARE_BITMAP(lru_bitmap, LRU_BITMAP_SIZE); > + > + VM_BUG_ON(nr > LRU_BITMAP_SIZE); While running your series rebased on v4.15-mmotm-2018-01-31-16-51, I'm hitting this VM_BUG sometimes on a ppc64 system where page size is set to 64K. In my case, nr=537 while LRU_BITMAP_SIZE is 512. Here is the stack trace displayed : kernel BUG at /local/laurent/work/glinux/mm/swap.c:728! Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1] LE SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries Modules linked in: pseries_rng rng_core vmx_crypto virtio_balloon ip_tables x_tables autofs4 virtio_net virtio_blk virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio CPU: 41 PID: 3485 Comm: cc1 Not tainted 4.15.0-mm1-lru+ #2 NIP: c0000000002b0784 LR: c0000000002b0780 CTR: c0000000007bab20 REGS: c0000005e126b740 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (4.15.0-mm1-lru+) MSR: 8000000000029033 CR: 28002422 XER: 20000000 CFAR: c000000000192ae4 SOFTE: 0 GPR00: c0000000002b0780 c0000005e126b9c0 c00000000103c100 000000000000001c GPR04: c0000005ffc4ce38 c0000005ffc63d00 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 GPR08: 0000000000000007 c000000000ec3a4c 00000005fed90000 0000000000000000 GPR12: 0000000000002200 c00000000fd8cd00 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 GPR24: c0000005e11ab980 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 c0000005e126ba60 GPR28: 0000000000000219 c0000005e126bc40 0000000000000000 c0000005ec5f0000 NIP [c0000000002b0784] release_pages+0x864/0x880 LR [c0000000002b0780] release_pages+0x860/0x880 Call Trace: [c0000005e126b9c0] [c0000000002b0780] release_pages+0x860/0x880 (unreliable) [c0000005e126bb30] [c00000000031da3c] free_pages_and_swap_cache+0x11c/0x150 [c0000005e126bb80] [c0000000002ef5f8] tlb_flush_mmu_free+0x68/0xa0 [c0000005e126bbc0] [c0000000002f1568] arch_tlb_finish_mmu+0x58/0xf0 [c0000005e126bbf0] [c0000000002f19d4] tlb_finish_mmu+0x34/0x60 [c0000005e126bc20] [c0000000003031e8] exit_mmap+0xd8/0x1d0 [c0000005e126bce0] [c0000000000f3188] mmput+0x78/0x160 [c0000005e126bd10] [c0000000000ff568] do_exit+0x348/0xd00 [c0000005e126bdd0] [c0000000000fffd8] do_group_exit+0x58/0xd0 [c0000005e126be10] [c00000000010006c] SyS_exit_group+0x1c/0x20 [c0000005e126be30] [c00000000000ba60] system_call+0x58/0x6c Instruction dump: 3949ffff 4bfffdc8 3c62ffce 38a00200 f9c100e0 f9e100e8 386345e8 fa0100f0 fa2100f8 fa410100 4bee2329 60000000 <0fe00000> 3b400001 4bfff868 7d5d5378 ---[ end trace 55b1651f9d92f14f ]--- > > + bitmap_zero(lru_bitmap, nr); > + > + for (h = 0; h < 2; h++) { > for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) { > struct page *page = pages[i]; > > + if (h == 0) { > + if (PageLRU(page) && page->lru_sentinel) { > + bitmap_set(lru_bitmap, i, 1); > + continue; > + } > + } else { > + if (!test_bit(i, lru_bitmap)) > + continue; > + } > + > if (is_huge_zero_page(page)) > continue; > > @@ -798,6 +815,7 @@ void release_pages(struct page **pages, int nr) > > list_add(&page->lru, &pages_to_free); > } > + } > if (locked_lru_batch) { > lru_batch_unlock(NULL, &locked_lru_batch, &locked_pgdat, > &flags); >