Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp836933wra; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 06:58:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227CyiuHXafasoQxMz2d5qdsNlPfyDNEBbisbRSYzacQRVPqa9zlDJdqbsYMr5XCKeb7qQlq X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:34a:: with SMTP id 68-v6mr35919589pld.276.1517583505398; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 06:58:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517583505; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=b/2EYi3z1Pj0tvR9KdLj8qWw5fyheXTYi3QnlhlD9TlQELhi0W7PQ+qpaHWY6KTdQc FYt0dqlUHN1HUS/8mDIP5bpBYA14MF9Pyq/c2b59GYkGK5+WBE6XpvgjNI4FJU2763C0 Ka31n/sBHQmo9aUoybf63k4wFu4Bs2vcW97HxTMQmb4QI4ZXDQuY0LS6ktaNmkeFDD1S BErsjWE49CjDPAWBS8XeEbL7KpsOhacSBmMIvb+RUE29xyidlmFBQr8ZxMifXlt8aO0m sm46URiLA1j5MY+tDb7G+vK6aIaXWlWGmekDbYTW6cjjwpJmoUoPXZ5nEx+3ipg2OOew bMlA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dmarc-filter:arc-authentication-results; bh=YuLVMMs+eV2G+TGFMGlF3Q4jP9eanuzuDadNtNw1k3c=; b=vucMixHGtPyyJcthYenaUWCPTvXDkV1jHp/xP05UU59Mkx+4g6O2Z6OTLbMBzc5Q5t zZD6Df6hf+vSm8EJQVvE3g16OTVXia2ylbUutGiku96UigJyqcSAbfsKOj2A2RQ0EEAz PK6F2qQ6w7z1CXl/D1HZYU7xTAYt1lH2tnEKzZenPxlKt3qJqKtbqI6UclANOoOuSK35 DZxxuw9/XR6FQKfPnJFsw/8Kbd2o4hX8WLXszeCR5/l3IYKs9vUhzfLUF1RxkZeL5QTf NB72+FuN6qWcHHs8yBOAaengYAjoMfiJCu6ghaRH4UKDnyWLo0FFsW+c3NziCi8txcza q7TA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c22si1520303pgn.460.2018.02.02.06.58.10; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 06:58:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752386AbeBBO4D (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:56:03 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53296 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751643AbeBBOz6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:55:58 -0500 Received: from jouet.infradead.org (unknown [179.97.41.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 406392178E; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 14:55:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 406392178E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=acme@kernel.org Received: by jouet.infradead.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4B6DF141E4A; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 11:55:56 -0300 (-03) Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 11:55:56 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Matthew Whitehead , peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/perf : Add check for CPUID instruction before using Message-ID: <20180202145556.GE26905@kernel.org> References: <1517581851-6600-1-git-send-email-tedheadster@gmail.com> <20180202143731.ohtpa4kh4twtj7yo@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180202143731.ohtpa4kh4twtj7yo@pd.tnic> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 03:37:31PM +0100, Borislav Petkov escreveu: > On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 09:30:51AM -0500, Matthew Whitehead wrote: > > We still officially support the ancient i486 cpu. First generation > > versions of this processor do not have the CPUID instruction, though > > later versions do. Therefore you must check that the cpu supports > > it before using it. At present it fails with an "Illegal Instruction" > > signal on the early processors. > > > > This code was based on similar code in the gcc package. > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Whitehead > > --- > > tools/perf/arch/x86/util/header.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > tools/perf/util/header.h | 2 ++ > > 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/header.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/header.c > > index fb0d71afee8b..d4d12894c64d 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/header.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/header.c > > @@ -7,6 +7,54 @@ > > > > #include "../../util/header.h" > > > > +/* This code based on gcc cpuid.h __get_cpuid_max() */ > > +unsigned int have_cpuid(void) > > You could've copied have_cpuid_p() from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c > > > +{ > > + unsigned int __eax, __ebx; > > + > > +#ifndef __x86_64__ > > +/* See if we can use cpuid. On AMD64 we always can. */ > > +#if __GNUC__ >= 3 > > + __asm__ ("pushf{l|d}\n\t" > > + "pushf{l|d}\n\t" > > + "pop{l}\t%0\n\t" > > + "mov{l}\t{%0, %1|%1, %0}\n\t" > > + "xor{l}\t{%2, %0|%0, %2}\n\t" > > + "push{l}\t%0\n\t" > > + "popf{l|d}\n\t" > > + "pushf{l|d}\n\t" > > + "pop{l}\t%0\n\t" > > + "popf{l|d}\n\t" > > + : "=&r" (__eax), "=&r" (__ebx) > > + : "i" (0x00200000)); > > +#else > > +/* Host GCCs older than 3.0 weren't supporting Intel asm syntax > > + * nor alternatives in i386 code. > > We don't support gcc < 3 > > #if GCC_VERSION < 30200 > # error Sorry, your compiler is too old - please upgrade it. > #endif > > There's even talk currently to raise the minimum version to 4.9 or so. But this is for the kernel build process, right? If we don't have a strict reason to forbid archeology... 8-) - Arnaldo