Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>,
        syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.15 42/55] ANDROID: binder: remove waitqueue when thread exits.
Date:   Fri,  2 Feb 2018 17:59:00 +0100
Message-Id: <20180202140830.212435163@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180202140826.117602411@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20180202140826.117602411@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>

commit f5cb779ba16334b45ba8946d6bfa6d9834d1527f upstream.

binder_poll() passes the thread->wait waitqueue that
can be slept on for work. When a thread that uses
epoll explicitly exits using BINDER_THREAD_EXIT,
the waitqueue is freed, but it is never removed
from the corresponding epoll data structure. When
the process subsequently exits, the epoll cleanup
code tries to access the waitlist, which results in
a use-after-free.

Prevent this by using POLLFREE when the thread exits.

Signed-off-by: Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/android/binder.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/android/binder.c
+++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
@@ -4302,6 +4302,18 @@ static int binder_thread_release(struct
 		if (t)
 			spin_lock(&t->lock);
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * If this thread used poll, make sure we remove the waitqueue
+	 * from any epoll data structures holding it with POLLFREE.
+	 * waitqueue_active() is safe to use here because we're holding
+	 * the inner lock.
+	 */
+	if ((thread->looper & BINDER_LOOPER_STATE_POLL) &&
+	    waitqueue_active(&thread->wait)) {
+		wake_up_poll(&thread->wait, POLLHUP | POLLFREE);
+	}
+
 	binder_inner_proc_unlock(thread->proc);
 
 	if (send_reply)