Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp1042829wra; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 10:10:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227eSanerN3Q4bin9VjMI7O4xpXNy5MtQUZ7Os75xkd7Bx2ZIF3uNq+v3wrqWmsaUwkBNBmz X-Received: by 10.101.101.68 with SMTP id a4mr31873874pgw.368.1517595027086; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 10:10:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517595027; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wmRClBmM+4ip6Ixe80DA8HKAmGMR2j+QmVbiusSicSJN60WQCD6hIg0/K9GgWmCdbE vBhUFWbqt1juuMeabPwGnuwa3HoeLejNiuI5pikpbf3TrDRTgQbOzgVAdnofN8ikYbw/ DhwwrKjK+kGP5Z4mEFlQAjWOK8jqfi7WoZMizMuCT9zgn5Er6b3NDRMvF399uaoXZxYu /IZjMe3o6F+PeP5rqceDARrZQSHnNR0VFG+3ZKzSXP0Qe4oVXohwbnv8U/byVS3wvZtk Ism61ujQ+gWxAZ8xMk9eEz25KgfiRAFPJ4Kt0LAqB4HAm5U+t5VSmLv/NNaolGOC7lO+ kCFQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=97Exe6pDb6TNgzeoQq2ul+9LqHIdvGezGsvvoTMepZ0=; b=yZDBjabu95kwZfq8vlwcvCjgWqxrAE+DFU9WqYNLGVDV9oGDmvY3KZ1nIMFnVpgBSq PVtBYUMa7twcOQ4v0xdV+ID+I+GGajjx/2nyIbi3m+yir4Ot7xRrUnZoAb7on58O58iZ wUu39RNTaHdpZxP6NGOcejbfylRV+j/VSYspgTJWd2+h0rCFlq6MPidvTquYlPixLi/S muDfGKRxDMQM//W13bBj/GODlRN0RCoxryg/9oBMFZQE0d2zHaZLXIH+m0MQ003qLjj7 2dvymN8ucx3ml+67GWmoev0OaORMOgkuHVYfLf5eFV3X76P6WbPLmgv+CK/TYiTrltu1 /flA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 67-v6si2160915ple.609.2018.02.02.10.10.12; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 10:10:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753166AbeBBRHt (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Feb 2018 12:07:49 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:36204 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752517AbeBBREY (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Feb 2018 12:04:24 -0500 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12258-90.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.71.90]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA410DA0; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 17:04:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Eduardo Otubo , Juergen Gross , "David S. Miller" , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.9 39/86] xen-netfront: remove warning when unloading module Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 17:57:59 +0100 Message-Id: <20180202140826.028009460@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.1 In-Reply-To: <20180202140822.679101338@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180202140822.679101338@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Eduardo Otubo [ Upstream commit 5b5971df3bc2775107ddad164018a8a8db633b81 ] v2: * Replace busy wait with wait_event()/wake_up_all() * Cannot garantee that at the time xennet_remove is called, the xen_netback state will not be XenbusStateClosed, so added a condition for that * There's a small chance for the xen_netback state is XenbusStateUnknown by the time the xen_netfront switches to Closed, so added a condition for that. When unloading module xen_netfront from guest, dmesg would output warning messages like below: [ 105.236836] xen:grant_table: WARNING: g.e. 0x903 still in use! [ 105.236839] deferring g.e. 0x903 (pfn 0x35805) This problem relies on netfront and netback being out of sync. By the time netfront revokes the g.e.'s netback didn't have enough time to free all of them, hence displaying the warnings on dmesg. The trick here is to make netfront to wait until netback frees all the g.e.'s and only then continue to cleanup for the module removal, and this is done by manipulating both device states. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo Acked-by: Juergen Gross Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c @@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ struct netfront_cb { /* IRQ name is queue name with "-tx" or "-rx" appended */ #define IRQ_NAME_SIZE (QUEUE_NAME_SIZE + 3) +static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(module_unload_q); + struct netfront_stats { u64 packets; u64 bytes; @@ -2051,10 +2053,12 @@ static void netback_changed(struct xenbu break; case XenbusStateClosed: + wake_up_all(&module_unload_q); if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) break; /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */ case XenbusStateClosing: + wake_up_all(&module_unload_q); xenbus_frontend_closed(dev); break; } @@ -2160,6 +2164,20 @@ static int xennet_remove(struct xenbus_d dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "%s\n", dev->nodename); + if (xenbus_read_driver_state(dev->otherend) != XenbusStateClosed) { + xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateClosing); + wait_event(module_unload_q, + xenbus_read_driver_state(dev->otherend) == + XenbusStateClosing); + + xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateClosed); + wait_event(module_unload_q, + xenbus_read_driver_state(dev->otherend) == + XenbusStateClosed || + xenbus_read_driver_state(dev->otherend) == + XenbusStateUnknown); + } + xennet_disconnect_backend(info); unregister_netdev(info->netdev);