Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp1283286wra; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 14:40:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2249Iobh5G6HjucztdIlTInyT/i3uJzm/8IcrWlr48b8ZLCRfX78oy+o4/d5eY97VNYjZ92o X-Received: by 10.99.55.5 with SMTP id e5mr426013pga.237.1517611230327; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 14:40:30 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517611230; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0kV+QlvTFtyml41iuxFuMk562MXrDNQOw/kvhOr9LvzCkjxvn4lv3YqWui3TVR2qcY +6/SyXvCUgsgpM+pgSsnfyqS4hgrlOMPdRwfMFiaAwqFdqOetvgOIEwTLw9QBNLee82D MD1qrhsqVcODEKkP1noRVXmKBk9EHP4bg3BzcRFXinirwDa/1MH5Fe4Sj+6iOvGDwXX0 OXR8/tSBxKacq3wW4z2JbWDw9FGupr864Xy8Ym+LYMtIgPOz/RkIuXDDsOlv8wDs8bvs sAfxwP3wsgSTYbTud0x2hVYx8mgYpE9+GLd9oC5dznPlE/Y5BeM7afgxSrfrNsK968Ka QgBA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from :cc:to:arc-authentication-results; bh=pXLI/I71wjZl0GvWCBlNou5hiSI1Eb+B6Y3GTvB+f4U=; b=Dg8H9ocUUCUUOqnjGYHKaFDHcvi9nSCcPBA67I1LF82V97CtUc/oFYp+DLLdFd242t DWR5xkekuZuKaEZbJpeB1Zs4osXOMzCTcWpg5StXOrqOPx934OngW2uV2z8LPakqT9n2 yoaVImP7R11y12G6MzumaS7AqV2WtQo3lOMjFvXgU6cbvEyq1kF1TvwNZeDgx9FYQiz6 bPA4fZkot9stDlVC3cUa6sXbJU0JuO7u9JWg05L2tUndad3ueXLtqBzCBjCazv3QGtI6 x2SHKdPCJpz1qxn9vTqUxOB0e5zZIf3UAig5PCq3831ukn6MG/5nG7YJ64uFOsqbFTMe FmlA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a185si2061988pgc.69.2018.02.02.14.40.15; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 14:40:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751993AbeBBVqs (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:46:48 -0500 Received: from srv06.itamservices.de ([78.46.48.226]:60723 "EHLO srv06.itamservices.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751544AbeBBVqk (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:46:40 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 910 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 16:46:40 EST Received: by srv06.itamservices.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ehivf-0000RK-AE; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 22:31:27 +0100 To: Trond Myklebust , Steven Rostedt Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List , LKML From: Daniel Reichelt Subject: Re: It's back! (Re: [REGRESSION] NFS is creating a hidden port (left over from xs_bind() )) Message-ID: <57220e1f-f81e-b30b-a4ea-39ad74c7c0d6@nachtgeist.net> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 22:31:26 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zvATQcned257m0yRLlQIpf4UvjFrgFcxd" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --zvATQcned257m0yRLlQIpf4UvjFrgFcxd Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1VV7miNeqSPmnhaBlJj86XeI56jV6Bky7"; protected-headers="v1" From: Daniel Reichelt To: Trond Myklebust , Steven Rostedt Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List , LKML Message-ID: <57220e1f-f81e-b30b-a4ea-39ad74c7c0d6@nachtgeist.net> Subject: Re: It's back! (Re: [REGRESSION] NFS is creating a hidden port (left over from xs_bind() )) --1VV7miNeqSPmnhaBlJj86XeI56jV6Bky7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Trond, Steven, eversince I switched from Debian Jessie to Stretch last summer, I've been seeing the very same hidden ports on an NFS server as described in [1], which is a follow-up to [2]. Your patch ([3], [4]) solved the issue back then. Later on, you changed that fix again in [5], which lead to the situation we're seeing today. Reverting 0b0ab51 fixes the issue for me. Let me know if you need more info. Thanks Daniel [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/30/341 [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/11/803 [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/19/759 [4] 4876cc779ff525b9c2376d8076edf47815e71f2c [5] 4b0ab51db32eba0f48b7618254742f143364a28d --1VV7miNeqSPmnhaBlJj86XeI56jV6Bky7-- --zvATQcned257m0yRLlQIpf4UvjFrgFcxd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJLBAEBCAA1FiEEg2wMpOXGvc4nunsZnjl+Rc/8gF8FAlp02K4XHGhhY2tpbmdA bmFjaHRnZWlzdC5uZXQACgkQnjl+Rc/8gF+HhQ//UCVSqA3wnJ6JZaafDOLPot1c CiaCsArQPgXzQo8HCulKjBc/TVdvh/LSNslwH2UXSsoUPz15OaJ0Sy915CMxQOl8 zsCZoQdxZS8g2o4ProeU2UKlcGbrC5Zx/d68TaQjUy3dWlhNNULsXK3kmwO8FFWG 5qd7cu6j5YwgL3g795r1g784BC0L9v/isZsTV/jLd+7ULIRBwfS13eiiEyRxPAve vICENfcj46iWrHuLRlQGnPLjs26gypxneduaSTtDBCWMPltzXuss/UuYTDeFeCFG bGSCZ/hoDPtqxVbHYs07KsYHU30al22Zt4RIZDGjz2aCOpgvVlMIZ+IrqjtFU9Vc x4CAti55FFGlinFsquIrdd5gfzyfKpUkK0q/utrybynMnm6cwN/nnwrp35ESIj55 vnVWAR5ptXAUzpTa1uU4CIBAFwBIMEUwYNsRMTNmSPm7x49Hx2Kv4qVT49MyhJko P/fc2xlFKeq8D8KiLT/6lO/d9ymYk+VKEyLZhCW8eqR4zKKVLJG1QiiuRUQbmMXI m7BOrMBeHZepe3Pf8SbRVA/yaDSL3UnYhOmKG5z9dzKNpBnAxUqN3EWjsviDSVZ7 Iu94Ueof+I9x/P5b8VXU58QyXB1a5EDr3opFDDBo3du1hMGnvY4ZnRfmh4FI6WGu X2sL7iKzL9mr1mFSyqU= =HUpz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zvATQcned257m0yRLlQIpf4UvjFrgFcxd--