Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271206AbTG2CEe (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:04:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271224AbTG2CEe (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:04:34 -0400 Received: from CPE-65-29-19-166.mn.rr.com ([65.29.19.166]:34689 "EHLO www.enodev.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271206AbTG2CEc (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:04:32 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test2-mm1: Can't mount root From: Shawn To: Andrew Morton Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <20030728150245.42f57f89.akpm@osdl.org> References: <1059428584.6146.9.camel@localhost> <20030728144704.49c433bc.akpm@osdl.org> <1059430015.6146.15.camel@localhost> <20030728150245.42f57f89.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1059444271.4786.25.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 28 Jul 2003 21:04:31 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1655 Lines: 43 OK, mucho more info (no wonder root=/dev/hde5 no worky): VP_IDE: (ide_setup_pci_device:) Could not enable device Found out my on board via pci ide was not getting initialized under -test2-mm1, so I went looking for driver/ide/pci/via82cxxx in the diffs. I found this in the -test2 diff: - (((u >> i) & 7) < 8))) { + (((u >> i) & 7) < 6))) { ...and reversing it did not change anything. The only other diff I could think might matter to drivers/ide/setup-pci.c -static unsigned long __init ide_get_or_set_dma_base (ide_hwif_t *hwif) +static unsigned long ide_get_or_set_dma_base (ide_hwif_t *hwif) ...which does not look like it should kill my via ide... I am now totally at my wit's end. Can I be helped now that I got off my fat arse? Info about my system: http://www.enodev.com/lspci.txt http://www.enodev.com/dmesg http://www.enodev.com/proc-ioports http://www.enodev.com/proc-interrupts http://www.enodev.com/proc-iomem http://www.enodev.com/proc_sex.html On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 17:02, Andrew Morton wrote: > Shawn wrote: > > > > Thank you, I didn't look very closely at the patch (really at all). > > > > The one thing making me think I had it right with "2105" was that the > > kernel did seem to grok it as (33,5). > > I don't understand. Are you saying that you now have it working? > If so, how? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/