Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp809052wra; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 10:46:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224/EPLGT4oTp4QOWpZHFuQapWU8Hed37ERn37KOYtR0xgk9AI3EZbi1hGCmQwmz8ahR/Hxv X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6ac7:: with SMTP id i7-v6mr37944381plt.368.1517683594307; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 10:46:34 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517683594; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AeIJXc4wfQqE36wHWCqsZrcLR8Zptzd+wLAsCPnQEtqWqYMKDAypXBnl5x25eROoVC 6DPzI7c8BsHhs6339w+YNlJkD+C4+fxR27XOTt+EXVZTRKgQ8f1T+1yKhQYSOtVBVmBs sGT3bFy6ngXUGiVfoaQp3/C3iGVziBk0a38hR8ePFkAGNMaYQgP+reN0AJI8C+CeIJrA UtHFVh1w8q6AwWsRwc57GTUqoDjsg9ddQQ/bjdqtwPBI+TRGYO9Z6FXsf48L8asfsyh5 ccfibZLcB28M9rLZej1evz63fE0TQ/AkaT7nJL1ooVzjvGs7olXdKSHQ2mxRoWvAbTb4 puSA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :spamdiagnosticmetadata:spamdiagnosticoutput:content-language :accept-language:in-reply-to:references:message-id:date:thread-index :thread-topic:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=Wfs5I0vtMvFMK6MAnOY2yQXM37+EInTVJ7z5rTrUWV0=; b=XCieT+ligCJgXT/g4MXKeRhC5/fPf9IfUEwos7VHZykOCamuoVF++FZwgGMkjEZz9l ijtdi/m3ZnGIifAnKe+erL6Ebj0i3p0QNnI9VdVjdEvcOwIqk8zeuVl/BdV+9adZ5IR9 62Hm1IS4KxdcQZVGpdZDz6yayPOBN186Im2QIypTFB+doIAgmIi8488fIr+C1WTcopWx +OpyaEy6CPrvejlvSj0X7zEYNUXihxPlHSPvAnIN+o9wT/QbMkXgzFTMvfE2qVh0EXrB A8Dhq2jWblH2aubMYH7HesGF6mAHpAsrZy6EuhmmwKd05bwASBb1TlptcWmobjBWb+69 I/Tg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@microsoft.com header.s=selector1 header.b=fxBYOunL; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=microsoft.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g6si1425359pgs.673.2018.02.03.10.46.19; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 10:46:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@microsoft.com header.s=selector1 header.b=fxBYOunL; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=microsoft.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755250AbeBCSoZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 3 Feb 2018 13:44:25 -0500 Received: from mail-bl2nam02on0129.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.38.129]:64103 "EHLO NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753171AbeBCSC5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Feb 2018 13:02:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Wfs5I0vtMvFMK6MAnOY2yQXM37+EInTVJ7z5rTrUWV0=; b=fxBYOunLbBQZHDIAqJZaT92g5oO0/8crYXtg+n+dwRJvPRzOGS6Q7GFKqNzGybwjL3p/HDOD/SrJEtkuIOehHUjUyC0BCjaJ3tadH1ztic3lRMXe/jFJfFLIiqwrVs+dN4kwYZDT3IHfwVy+QNA8jdplwNC9ReUZ74tKJoG9yCc= Received: from BL0PR2101MB1027.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (52.132.20.161) by BL0PR2101MB0993.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (52.132.23.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.485.5; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 18:02:50 +0000 Received: from BL0PR2101MB1027.namprd21.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a8da:b5d9:d710:9bf9]) by BL0PR2101MB1027.namprd21.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a8da:b5d9:d710:9bf9%3]) with mapi id 15.20.0485.006; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 18:02:50 +0000 From: Sasha Levin To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" CC: Venkat Duvvuru , Michael Chan , "David S . Miller" , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 099/110] bnxt_en: Fix the 'Invalid VF' id check in bnxt_vf_ndo_prep routine. Thread-Topic: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 099/110] bnxt_en: Fix the 'Invalid VF' id check in bnxt_vf_ndo_prep routine. Thread-Index: AQHTnRkFcKtB6EvWFkqKwSgXh5d35g== Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 18:01:30 +0000 Message-ID: <20180203180015.29073-99-alexander.levin@microsoft.com> References: <20180203180015.29073-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20180203180015.29073-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [52.168.54.252] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;BL0PR2101MB0993;7:bqZQ+KZA8UZKAtVDD2fiTfNrl4J138wu8iVxUgDc54DmzXg27MghE/bjhVq6bdh5Lupky3TcxYbX+KZgCo4cR9k9vkI+JOYh7nCHT7mqsetYzWuAL4yvLD/IMSmie+kbm5Bg8Pc5wUIYWCtZefkmu6iNOnFCivoMKXSnfNaGFQlYQNQbuJjaQjOSeJQs2LESZzegTBm6lUm6c+bBtdddUlD70YopJNLBFQYMHaWRfoU/Bp8wwhDToBvNXpvK/+SS x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f02fa46e-418a-482e-6659-08d56b305707 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(48565401081)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(2017052603307)(7193020);SRVR:BL0PR2101MB0993; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BL0PR2101MB0993: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(28532068793085)(89211679590171); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(61425038)(6040501)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(3231101)(2400082)(944501161)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038)(6041288)(20161123558120)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(6072148)(201708071742011);SRVR:BL0PR2101MB0993;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BL0PR2101MB0993; x-forefront-prvs: 05724A8921 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(346002)(39380400002)(39860400002)(376002)(366004)(396003)(189003)(199004)(6436002)(186003)(3660700001)(8936002)(105586002)(2906002)(6346003)(6116002)(3280700002)(3846002)(97736004)(6486002)(1076002)(2950100002)(6666003)(81156014)(86362001)(575784001)(76176011)(102836004)(2501003)(5250100002)(26005)(68736007)(10090500001)(81166006)(8676002)(59450400001)(53936002)(5660300001)(22452003)(305945005)(107886003)(7736002)(4326008)(86612001)(36756003)(99286004)(316002)(6512007)(10290500003)(72206003)(6506007)(14454004)(478600001)(25786009)(106356001)(2900100001)(54906003)(110136005)(66066001)(22906009)(217873001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:BL0PR2101MB0993;H:BL0PR2101MB1027.namprd21.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;A:1;LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: jNmdYYiQPmfkjb68u1scXcX0HClE+Qg4JUlMt0SknaKa8+1MKWSFDE+CZQoQYydvx/DVyGpC0X4TqAOzu30ikQ== spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f02fa46e-418a-482e-6659-08d56b305707 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Feb 2018 18:01:30.9409 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL0PR2101MB0993 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Venkat Duvvuru [ Upstream commit 78f300049335ae81a5cc6b4b232481dc5e1f9d41 ] In bnxt_vf_ndo_prep (which is called by bnxt_get_vf_config ndo), there is a check for "Invalid VF id". Currently, the check is done against max_vfs. However, the user doesn't always create max_vfs. So, the check should be against the created number of VFs. The number of bnxt_vf_info structures that are allocated in bnxt_alloc_vf_resources routine is the "number of requested VFs". So, if an "invalid VF id" falls between the requested number of VFs and the max_vfs, the driver will be dereferencing an invalid pointer. Fixes: c0c050c58d84 ("bnxt_en: New Broadcom ethernet driver.") Signed-off-by: Venkat Devvuru Signed-off-by: Michael Chan Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c b/drivers/net/= ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c index 5ee18660bc33..c9617675f934 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int bnxt_vf_ndo_prep(struct bnxt *bp, int vf_id) netdev_err(bp->dev, "vf ndo called though sriov is disabled\n"); return -EINVAL; } - if (vf_id >=3D bp->pf.max_vfs) { + if (vf_id >=3D bp->pf.active_vfs) { netdev_err(bp->dev, "Invalid VF id %d\n", vf_id); return -EINVAL; } --=20 2.11.0