Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp1385551wra; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 02:52:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224pMh1W661FV7UBJICp1x0Eg+nYcgkqSEqo9hAvM5le88WaX5rKxM4q2J1LuQOd3IN8nlVW X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b082:: with SMTP id p2-v6mr9876791plr.314.1517741560362; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 02:52:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517741560; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TQzhqrr1iI03AMyfhE427962XK/14JpufLXkG/f4Kz5TEIp7tjkdnOd+GOvS/b7jgJ sG1jJP9VoAbSMej+cpW3zorRE1oNeK1VgpxsuEmuTMtETU1rXPMJc3dTt4fcdmGFm8Se kyugPtRd8tZtPDL5JXC67v89eBdnTFiQGuhe8RCUHMWM8mMVkwLz6xVlbLiJsEKypXHJ MplDsEEzPhYsqmBgz9Fv7EKkk0a7e9ETKbohrFWdyYow1KXqfazgCU6tytVi84b3VgQx ADGyG3XxB2L14o9M75zgtD6oH3JvJ5dnbJ7YKGLMIJ+IsvBpdaG6Z9cAJtY7T1lKmZDm cSOA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=w0RCE5swkCym+INcHw0w3wvOC9NYcEqnLyhDxnBADLg=; b=X4KU1+WP0o2rpShJoKrwCNzJfBsFFyEPFNrTMoPddPW683I5Df34ZsFSl9d/bzsHVv cP8qprleywikJMhtoHTHd2mGuS9fK2vk1X3AKTCTUozYAknDipV3d/u4ThmSiUD4M48o el5xfXliNkECDb6FUC0RFnVaYtMZtVtSEomvb869OWpw86kTqO3AmOpd6Kwen5Y8YcLA rY+Qzn1jsXB50nPYe2JD9D/RjHFOXhextii1Y0fxCawy8txKAhm6OgdJI81KnZKM74QN QAQhAd8dqCJNOpWkGV3XdYjMNTVSgXYkYBU40QnDpyTVFbF+Aj/lnJZIdNrDBSe7byg+ /9cg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@tycho-ws.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=LN7CEtK5; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v14si4114000pgq.604.2018.02.04.02.52.26; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 02:52:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@tycho-ws.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=LN7CEtK5; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751914AbeBDKuq (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 4 Feb 2018 05:50:46 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:35930 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751103AbeBDKuR (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Feb 2018 05:50:17 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f67.google.com with SMTP id f3so20537276wmc.1 for ; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 02:50:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tycho-ws.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=w0RCE5swkCym+INcHw0w3wvOC9NYcEqnLyhDxnBADLg=; b=LN7CEtK5hmAws99PXp/NNYk49FwilSCLyeaLsmfVnacfQ5zqF9XLnh7d0H1+D3lSxx BjKa2dOnB2l+bu7uZdTiRtEEiT2o3wVbElF1ChHiQ+/G6k1wdOOITTjk6ceJzJbe/UX1 Gi+rwWEk9urrPau45DYBTo7VtoqfylJVUNtpTFt08aRbZB1ZRKHHgi4elDgskhZUiZJM CBSN4cWFOk8ZeKRZLstamoikupq7Qb8xkMTF/TTv1OosXalt/r0EpOeSmtnuoXW4udT3 4aMLad5E6DIB7Ugy3rQZqwPhpJChRkcAj48/ti7DDgyzGZ8xSnaT+iUofMiIzm98czV/ VK4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=w0RCE5swkCym+INcHw0w3wvOC9NYcEqnLyhDxnBADLg=; b=gPdHmGwHtGQpUDLXnVY6lbKJKonJuwp1MG+i757HvDZjP619vJ6k3YsBwJPFV2NlkV YNDbIXJmUEyVzrDgWgZwHqywhKJS4fr+GMfhQhI1HkiqBiRoWdxkuwhCd5f4CN1dH/6R 7ouCFzdeGxLHu+wXhhmdeplncdfptgAsFTn8Vkp6ZfWJtoQYBEebWzVgEBYnSlHuLisG nvA86slbdgxBdGE/89Xc/+iGlja5u9TqI9kXFwrwTlovtw8troPjiz9AB9K1/k9Axt7q IwavIX4v3uuCdbX44NahwNSaA8TwY4F4Iqc6bn+X7z+55TtelMokRZ9NDRxUQB/gZU2b 67hg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfNi4mG+a2v8TufTYTLyAgULKlJPvBCDdGuvUj9HYY+trul7MPs 1hj0q5yRSadvNzrYU2mZUQft4xMaq3Y= X-Received: by 10.28.147.66 with SMTP id v63mr31376311wmd.118.1517741415612; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 02:50:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from cisco.fosdem.net ([2001:67c:1810:f051:2123:e18a:e3fd:72f8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 81sm3751766wmi.26.2018.02.04.02.50.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 04 Feb 2018 02:50:14 -0800 (PST) From: Tycho Andersen To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: Kees Cook , Andy Lutomirski , Oleg Nesterov , "Eric W . Biederman" , "Serge E . Hallyn" , Christian Brauner , Tyler Hicks , Akihiro Suda , Tycho Andersen Subject: [RFC 2/3] seccomp: hoist out filter resolving logic Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:49:45 +0100 Message-Id: <20180204104946.25559-3-tycho@tycho.ws> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.1 In-Reply-To: <20180204104946.25559-1-tycho@tycho.ws> References: <20180204104946.25559-1-tycho@tycho.ws> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hoist out the nth filter resolving logic that ptrace uses into a new function. We'll use this in the next patch to implement the new PTRACE_SECCOMP_GET_FILTER_FLAGS command. This is based on an older patch that I had sent a while ago; it significantly revamps the get_nth_filter logic based on previous suggestions from Oleg. Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen CC: Kees Cook CC: Andy Lutomirski CC: Oleg Nesterov CC: Eric W. Biederman CC: "Serge E. Hallyn" CC: Christian Brauner CC: Tyler Hicks CC: Akihiro Suda --- kernel/seccomp.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c index 9541eb379e74..800db3f2866f 100644 --- a/kernel/seccomp.c +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c @@ -1179,49 +1179,68 @@ long prctl_set_seccomp(unsigned long seccomp_mode, char __user *filter) } #if defined(CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER) && defined(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE) -long seccomp_get_filter(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long filter_off, - void __user *data) +static struct seccomp_filter *get_nth_filter(struct task_struct *task, + unsigned long filter_off) { - struct seccomp_filter *filter; - struct sock_fprog_kern *fprog; - long ret; - unsigned long count = 0; - - if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) || - current->seccomp.mode != SECCOMP_MODE_DISABLED) { - return -EACCES; - } + struct seccomp_filter *orig, *filter; + unsigned long count; + /* + * Note: this is only correct because the caller should be the (ptrace) + * tracer of the task, otherwise lock_task_sighand is needed. + */ spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + if (task->seccomp.mode != SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER) { - ret = -EINVAL; - goto out; + spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); } - filter = task->seccomp.filter; - while (filter) { - filter = filter->prev; + orig = task->seccomp.filter; + __get_seccomp_filter(orig); + spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + + count = 0; + for (filter = orig; filter; filter = filter->prev) count++; - } if (filter_off >= count) { - ret = -ENOENT; + filter = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); goto out; } - count -= filter_off; - filter = task->seccomp.filter; - while (filter && count > 1) { - filter = filter->prev; + count -= filter_off; + for (filter = orig; filter && count > 1; filter = filter->prev) count--; - } if (WARN_ON(count != 1 || !filter)) { - /* The filter tree shouldn't shrink while we're using it. */ - ret = -ENOENT; + filter = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); goto out; } + __get_seccomp_filter(filter); + +out: + __put_seccomp_filter(orig); + return filter; +} + +long seccomp_get_filter(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long filter_off, + void __user *data) +{ + struct seccomp_filter *filter; + struct sock_fprog_kern *fprog; + long ret; + + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) || + current->seccomp.mode != SECCOMP_MODE_DISABLED) { + return -EACCES; + } + + filter = get_nth_filter(task, filter_off); + if (IS_ERR(filter)) + return PTR_ERR(filter); + fprog = filter->prog->orig_prog; if (!fprog) { /* This must be a new non-cBPF filter, since we save @@ -1236,17 +1255,11 @@ long seccomp_get_filter(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long filter_off, if (!data) goto out; - __get_seccomp_filter(filter); - spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); - if (copy_to_user(data, fprog->filter, bpf_classic_proglen(fprog))) ret = -EFAULT; - __put_seccomp_filter(filter); - return ret; - out: - spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + __put_seccomp_filter(filter); return ret; } #endif -- 2.14.1