Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp2623233wra; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 07:11:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224SiJaz7tkGfqb5yB5H3wVvx66bIsLYY5OmUZNUiCpPy3mT5hmD2h34sCE+I/ZD8IMhFUsu X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a983:: with SMTP id bh3-v6mr28318006plb.237.1517843518904; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 07:11:58 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517843518; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UP3NBYKwYycF5yzkPJ4itlYOW20JtkgN7w1T/gG/VXOKGxdUt1Cdc0mtOJPzD/dcey Fyis9z8SmXFlJFcyzP9gKctyuu/chhv7wAw1ITkoLQ3M79wezvDGulpfU0aOxB0KSJ4I 75gCnunwFjqKpJNZyrNHFE6n5fNigc77nwXdNZ+3ksttImprQFvcdvKJ3J3912dggOMi Yrg2BnMfiXjLxgnei+fI5rsWsblYVymBlYe/+sAuLQhH5llfuWxhOWXOOtWuQdjWuj2i Zyluj6MMvXupIiBvhtcjCchuQxHQaUO/gEFsVd5sACwjITmLuPRJjuNiitPQ297S6NhI OLpQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=CxL/WDAItdLdcBBMQ1CQ3ockgVLB0m9luKvsUzU36ho=; b=vTcKmunSqqlKVMTMin3CsLz0Mzxb8QZkkg7M9MtzHAC46A4eOJXNPM48F5BBhNdKlV 2KSN6NYDdwr2+BLBeW3hnomqxKuFInj4lBU+a8V5yZh6Xuk4t4KtUP2+1aYCDyMkwmnm yMQ66AzESU5Y2RrjiCC1HdWjbs9dPWy/08VyrRu7odMoMs0WrIVzw92O1OFBmgl2mObB m+BRAxDDongsIVQbXZJ/73FoBHAzWmeIQzTgZfgzNbC13E5trozuQPklCkEfhStBsnye FCuuSaCx+3Znw+drEl5BHzqqCD5FyKxWudtPCWJj/ml3sub1PyovfYocUBOUU2xw1tfV 4S1w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g6-v6si80plp.731.2018.02.05.07.11.44; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 07:11:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753207AbeBEPJ3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Feb 2018 10:09:29 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:21162 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752914AbeBEPJY (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2018 10:09:24 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Feb 2018 07:09:20 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,465,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="27411002" Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([10.232.112.44]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2018 07:09:19 -0800 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 08:13:14 -0700 From: Keith Busch To: "jianchao.wang" Cc: axboe@fb.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, sagi@grimberg.me Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] nvme-pci: fix the freeze and quiesce for shutdown and reset case Message-ID: <20180205151314.GP24417@localhost.localdomain> References: <1517554849-7802-1-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com> <1517554849-7802-3-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com> <20180202182413.GH24417@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:26:03AM +0800, jianchao.wang wrote: > > Freezing is not just for shutdown. It's also used so > > blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues will work if the queue count changes across > > resets. > blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues will freeze the queue itself. Please refer to. > static void __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, Yes, but how many requests are you letting enter to their demise by freezing on the wrong side of the reset? We don't use the nuclear option out of convenience.