Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp2998014wra; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 13:52:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2251jiElUybztvjMRqhWSrv2T1xUd09eaN1iw2AO615S+edZUISgDYtISCIn6+vUnIeF0/r9 X-Received: by 10.99.126.71 with SMTP id o7mr172649pgn.450.1517867562864; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 13:52:42 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517867562; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dqrIXmjChO4d8tLHvpkLj7t45nl/ztmIo6eqJLC6RoSqpRKnsr0GJg0jldvssRemp/ ikOUphTRpl8sDphZMMqoOG3gQqmyULTNaikJkP+909gMP8H/RzTLVI37L6B1EPmBivXW 4ZCouL2GIH11U8KBQc85mlAy1Ya6JhC1iMBBEKIslZnWSW1RVFJ3Eu+gofxeeZbOUjWh qvzLW4mUBjpFenpP5kHqnjFVrv8cJPrP9aPuh+qIQv9qDC2m+Qi7+WVdd7moV9P6Jdwq 3zRY4xRbCT0ChGiVt5XNS02Ax3q2gCWZjD64k5sWF1hcbuQf4UKqLaMzJ7d4fc8s5sge I+2w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:from:cc:to:subject :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :user-agent:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=7fKJwGDjrDFik4F16DxYHTF7e9S6tw3JlFfqVzyjT2Y=; b=NQYwAVM9qreyVNpcPZthkDbwFt3UQoS3NDDN9hUkJLy04oNvqsJEMRVKOJ1R5Eopf6 EmIOhbwcYaSCbhRagjrR1rWl9gYEqWsPpU1PHfz6Uty4fH6JlDWT6jNk4eMj/N5B6CYy FrAOP/fel0T1mGXOuNZHEvdMnp2WPHuTx6iOCa/bXbgc0f0wPORkwMdhlaMCG5bs+4tj Uv3TJ+HC1PpEVQlxf5TPir60n5dQpf7A5a0ztpOB+z/z5PicHANlGNamI+VDElsu8OXn 4KoQWiuC5tFmCh3Kmar+vGH5CtYj7YgR2uxyDALx+2Wde2pj4fc9+dTt06ojDafrugsW cRzA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 4-v6si3525067plc.812.2018.02.05.13.52.27; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 13:52:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752176AbeBEVvx convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Feb 2018 16:51:53 -0500 Received: from saturn.retrosnub.co.uk ([178.18.118.26]:33374 "EHLO saturn.retrosnub.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752086AbeBEVvt (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2018 16:51:49 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.4] (cpc91196-cmbg18-2-0-cust659.5-4.cable.virginm.net [81.96.234.148]) by saturn.retrosnub.co.uk (Postfix; Retrosnub mail submission) with ESMTPSA id 50C9E40740; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 21:51:46 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 21:51:44 +0000 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <9420fc82-1a37-3601-bafe-f57ef953bfcd@users.sourceforge.net> References: <0406765c-bdd1-1a82-cf66-1c248063ae4f@users.sourceforge.net> <20180204112346.0977e938@archlinux> <9420fc82-1a37-3601-bafe-f57ef953bfcd@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: Re: hid-sensor-accel-3d: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in hid_accel_3d_probe() To: SF Markus Elfring , Jonathan Cameron , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org CC: Hartmut Knaack , Jiri Kosina , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Srinivas Pandruvada , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org From: Jonathan Cameron Message-ID: <87DF341A-1356-4B1B-8D25-14D5B0AAB01D@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5 February 2018 18:26:59 GMT, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >> If making changes like this I would suggest only sending one until >> you have have a response from the relevant maintainer. > >The corresponding feedback can become more positive for such >a transformation pattern after a while, can't it? Not in that sort of time period. > > >> It would save you time as often these sorts of changes are >> a matter of personal taste and weighing up of costs vs gains >> - hence it is not obvious that they will be accepted. > >Can the wording “WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message” >(from the script “checkpatch.pl”) be another incentive? No. The key word is possible. Check patch is dumb and often gives false positives. > >Regards, >Markus -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.