Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271852AbTG2Pih (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:38:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271854AbTG2Pih (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:38:37 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:18316 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271852AbTG2Pig (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:38:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:35:07 -0700 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: Alan Cox , jakub@redhat.com Cc: szepe@pinerecords.com, jamagallon@able.es, kwall@kurtwerks.com, lcapitulino@prefeitura.sp.gov.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6-test2: gcc-3.3.1 warning. Message-Id: <20030729083507.3dd20485.rddunlap@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1059479661.3118.5.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> References: <1059396053.442.2.camel@lorien> <20030728225017.GJ32673@louise.pinerecords.com> <20030729002221.GD263@kurtwerks.com> <20030729045512.GM32673@louise.pinerecords.com> <20030729092857.GA28348@werewolf.able.es> <20030729093521.GA1286@louise.pinerecords.com> <20030729094820.GC28348@werewolf.able.es> <20030729095858.GB1286@louise.pinerecords.com> <20030729101126.GC29124@werewolf.able.es> <20030729102007.GC1286@louise.pinerecords.com> <1059479661.3118.5.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Organization: OSDL X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: +5V?h'hZQPB9kW Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1244 Lines: 30 On 29 Jul 2003 12:57:52 +0100 Alan Cox wrote: | On Maw, 2003-07-29 at 11:20, Tomas Szepe wrote: | > > What is the difference between backporting a patch from 3.3.1-pre to 3.3, | > > and using 3.3.1-pre directly ? Ah, that you get less bug corrected. | > | > Large. 3.3 is a development series. It DOES introduce new stuff. | > | > In production environments you definitely want to stick with 3.2.3 | > or (better yet) 2.95.3. | | 3.2 is probably the best, but lots of people are using gcc 3.3 to build | kernels and so far all the things we've hit have been the stricter | parser throwing up on technically invalid C in the kernel source/ I really hate to get this back to the original problem, but is the reported warning a gcc 3.3.x problem? I don't see the assembly problem here. | arch/i386/kernel/reboot.c: In function `machine_restart': | arch/i386/kernel/reboot.c:261: warning: use of memory input without | lvalue in asm operand 0 is deprecated -- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/