Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <1517924768.25841.32.camel@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX 1/1] block, bfq: add requeue-request hook
From:   Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To:     Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Cc:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        'Paolo Valente' via bfq-iosched 
        <bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com>,
        Alban Browaeys <alban.browaeys@gmail.com>, ming.lei@redhat.com,
        ivan@ludios.org, 169364@studenti.unimore.it,
        Serena Ziviani <ziviani.serena@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 06 Feb 2018 14:46:08 +0100
In-Reply-To: <77124223e6116350a5184a5199850304@natalenko.name>
References: <20180205190510.5499-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
         <20180205190510.5499-2-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
         <ee76e49c0d1ceab07c20e9d27e2fdc46@natalenko.name>
         <1517903761.9843.12.camel@gmx.de>
         <899B68CC-5955-4418-8BFF-DC55A743A61B@linaro.org>
         <1517918234.25841.31.camel@gmx.de>
         <77124223e6116350a5184a5199850304@natalenko.name>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 13:16 +0100, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> 06.02.2018 12:57, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Not me. ?Box seems to be fairly sure that it is bfq.  Twice again box
> > went belly up on me in fairly short order with bfq, but seemed fine
> > with deadline.  I'm currently running deadline again, and box again
> > seems solid, thought I won't say _is_ solid until it's been happily
> > trundling along with deadline for a quite a bit longer.
> 
> Sorry for the noise, but just to make it clear, are we talking about 
> "deadline" or "mq-deadline" now?

mq-deadline.