Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp889992wra; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:02:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225KJ6Rj7uxkVPrOHwhBw87LsPbgd4fDPXWgEqRvbhqkzXqMthkxxSyv1BdsDpclKw4wkCUv X-Received: by 10.99.1.70 with SMTP id 67mr2504373pgb.23.1517936549454; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 09:02:29 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517936549; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eHiPWbJ5ImcmBqaamPdzJApHk2pjU1IpWagQ+UuVcVZsrv60brUdHppua2OVUYAE9E xovNt3PNM6ifGprmTG754D+fWR2K1VwFAGbILI9dI+s6yTSfTkgUFZwRgESIyD09BGuZ pp+2K68qFa+Xcx8JgjwxkixSQIdSw2x53abzdr01QJE3UWX2KniTdSZI87PZ6w4vdti3 N2ioKVMIZ89L5oQew4YbEmZzmObQ45JRJXdIPKQq9JwQtvJe8TXmy71J+Lc6cS5kmk8f MUb2Wi+N1lw7ORfMd+GrkYThDWgWDcc1KLMvNqwoabVTQsvlrqDW/dMlzudeV0z/pO7E lKFw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=D7g8R2Kgkt65d5rp38GfekH7atTs6WcsVMSv9cJ81IQ=; b=VIAf/DCpQQ4dK26yf00S7dFQrONLMJEm5LbmiVp+mlai9s9adM1o9THb3Gzwpu2kpP /wSn3IWHGhkZ4xx5qFhnet+hcv1lPx20aMe0VIZ1Hbu317wOi8fEYcskdVK3Vn26Enxh APGOAncYkPNmKRW8VwvUvN/U1EF/sQhe19FiRZp9gkpOIaeeJpr6XJdmm2FsEWjxXscH PkHLD34TWcDJjw+S1la3Vw/+P0iFQ93QgDi+kqSLaX5Ot0wDUxE00WnyqLw5mnN+dA7g 9p3h/0ljLcPYlrOHtq+oqrTdfKQEEy5AOONIf6wg2Cdv7uhj+DX7wNVFYgYGg0sl/YAC G5cg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a1-v6si1931617plt.588.2018.02.06.09.02.13; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 09:02:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753311AbeBFRBZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 6 Feb 2018 12:01:25 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:59358 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752861AbeBFRAe (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2018 12:00:34 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.133.2.98]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 410F31194; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:00:33 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.15 00/60] 4.15.2-stable review Message-ID: <20180206170033.GB30774@kroah.com> References: <20180205182213.902626065@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 06:32:43AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 02/05/2018 10:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.2 release. > > There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed Feb 7 18:21:57 UTC 2018. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Crap, the previous log was for 4.14. Here is the correct one. > > Build results: > total: 147 pass: 146 fail: 1 > Failed builds: > mips:allmodconfig > Qemu test results: > total: 126 pass: 126 fail: 0 > > ... meaning the MIPS build did not magically fix itself. Sorry for the confusion. Ah, I was wondering what happened :)