Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp950178wra; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:59:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226A7WJqaO96QEQ4qAUdrIgl0slFV1autylfEbZ2TFo9BVIuC8J+f/wpp3UKg2SXiBHZVZbR X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:1c3:: with SMTP id b61-v6mr3201414plb.190.1517939984353; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 09:59:44 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517939984; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AeGI2s1lrwy7YuFo5TrMZ6SZstnz8a43Yt+5PaCPMnpGocjh2wP81jrlhXu9xuObdA 5GJ4IER4v7RkbgUB4UwCEDKPJghdo0+UFqe8CD9z3dgV1Mqfipb33YiZg2yxzgLHqrSC ggkdBCXKD4QRuZ26cvFdnEpIGX7gpngSk9GJAtOP1RHw89hbgqCcDakUh6DeDnfhmSye ENOrJpkBVc/bonM2JeNW35oPgJ1Z++JjrZU//1LLbAG9F2xqlLAfl1yPCp+COWWngDKy KK+PyA7ZQvCg2v8anBZr39kuq18Hfl0tOT4S1grJAR96XrQiMd1wOBMSQmyqHppUxGCj W+Jw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=F7ypdVg5yyLG/p4FLxNKnEI1V6/j2y+M7vE3it4dKf8=; b=PRhbrKdA5Xhs15uRuEJMG7YvBxp1tlBptWu6AaGUf1CeGs1JYehT0D7c6d0fpb7HCm d5caUHMtLcOsTu3NoBSL2grsE9azmMMG8FVKjj1HsT/c8OfbueSQWiZfXi5KvQDfjFnh VFMWjcg9Nocn8yfx7JizIcNNJd3Ay0d77qNRdpDpY/5EqsUDpF35HJ8XpaWJDsauoG9U OW+vHO4NQHvTNZyY/kwNhyzi3bf13zFFOCeEWeGWOP2/pqGmwmtnoM92eGspfUj51s+p j16opzotvNlH/GzI6ryOFnxxoUZnuBoegcJdqhMn8eFx/mTSnuPiGoGKaUVenkEWx0rH SN3g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d16-v6si1648428pll.210.2018.02.06.09.59.30; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 09:59:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752944AbeBFR54 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 6 Feb 2018 12:57:56 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:41098 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752803AbeBFR5N (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2018 12:57:13 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA08C164F; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:57:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from approximate.cambridge.arm.com (approximate.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.207.62]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 491613F25C; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:57:10 -0800 (PST) From: Marc Zyngier To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Peter Maydell , Christoffer Dall , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Mark Rutland , Robin Murphy , Ard Biesheuvel , Andrew Jones , Hanjun Guo , Jayachandran C , Jon Masters , Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: [PATCH v4 09/17] arm/arm64: KVM: Turn kvm_psci_version into a static inline Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:56:13 +0000 Message-Id: <20180206175621.929-10-marc.zyngier@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.2 In-Reply-To: <20180206175621.929-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> References: <20180206175621.929-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org We're about to need kvm_psci_version in HYP too. So let's turn it into a static inline, and pass the kvm structure as a second parameter (so that HYP can do a kern_hyp_va on it). Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- include/kvm/arm_psci.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- virt/kvm/arm/psci.c | 12 ++---------- 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c index 036e1f3d77a6..408c04d789a5 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ #include #include +#include + #include #include #include @@ -350,14 +352,16 @@ int __hyp_text __kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) if (exit_code == ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP && (kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64 || - kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_HVC32) && - vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0) == PSCI_0_2_FN_PSCI_VERSION) { - u64 val = PSCI_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED; - if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2, vcpu->arch.features)) - val = 2; - - vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, val); - goto again; + kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_HVC32)) { + u32 val = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0); + + if (val == PSCI_0_2_FN_PSCI_VERSION) { + val = kvm_psci_version(vcpu, kern_hyp_va(vcpu->kvm)); + if (unlikely(val == KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1)) + val = PSCI_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED; + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, val); + goto again; + } } if (static_branch_unlikely(&vgic_v2_cpuif_trap) && diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_psci.h b/include/kvm/arm_psci.h index ed1dd8088f1c..e518e4e3dfb5 100644 --- a/include/kvm/arm_psci.h +++ b/include/kvm/arm_psci.h @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #ifndef __KVM_ARM_PSCI_H__ #define __KVM_ARM_PSCI_H__ +#include #include #define KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1 PSCI_VERSION(0, 1) @@ -26,7 +27,25 @@ #define KVM_ARM_PSCI_LATEST KVM_ARM_PSCI_1_0 -int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); +/* + * We need the KVM pointer independently from the vcpu as we can call + * this from HYP, and need to apply kern_hyp_va on it... + */ +static inline int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm) +{ + /* + * Our PSCI implementation stays the same across versions from + * v0.2 onward, only adding the few mandatory functions (such + * as FEATURES with 1.0) that are required by newer + * revisions. It is thus safe to return the latest. + */ + if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2, vcpu->arch.features)) + return KVM_ARM_PSCI_LATEST; + + return KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1; +} + + int kvm_hvc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); #endif /* __KVM_ARM_PSCI_H__ */ diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c b/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c index 46a98fee3ef5..e105c1153794 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu) if (!vcpu) return PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS; if (!vcpu->arch.power_off) { - if (kvm_psci_version(source_vcpu) != KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1) + if (kvm_psci_version(source_vcpu, kvm) != KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1) return PSCI_RET_ALREADY_ON; else return PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS; @@ -232,14 +232,6 @@ static void kvm_psci_system_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) kvm_prepare_system_event(vcpu, KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_RESET); } -int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) -{ - if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2, vcpu->arch.features)) - return KVM_ARM_PSCI_LATEST; - - return KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1; -} - static int kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; @@ -397,7 +389,7 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) */ static int kvm_psci_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - switch (kvm_psci_version(vcpu)) { + switch (kvm_psci_version(vcpu, vcpu->kvm)) { case KVM_ARM_PSCI_1_0: return kvm_psci_1_0_call(vcpu); case KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_2: -- 2.14.2