Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <1517995431.25619.5.camel@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX 1/1] block, bfq: add requeue-request hook
From:   Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        'Paolo Valente' via bfq-iosched 
        <bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com>,
        Alban Browaeys <alban.browaeys@gmail.com>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Ivan Kozik <ivan@ludios.org>,
        SERENA ZIVIANI <169364@studenti.unimore.it>,
        Serena Ziviani <ziviani.serena@gmail.com>,
        Holger =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hoffst=E4tte?= 
        <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>
Date:   Wed, 07 Feb 2018 10:23:51 +0100
In-Reply-To: <E52CCDEA-279A-40D8-AD9B-F4D1AF351BF1@linaro.org>
References: <20180205190510.5499-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
         <20180205190510.5499-2-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
         <ee76e49c0d1ceab07c20e9d27e2fdc46@natalenko.name>
         <1517903761.9843.12.camel@gmx.de>
         <899B68CC-5955-4418-8BFF-DC55A743A61B@linaro.org>
         <1517918234.25841.31.camel@gmx.de>
         <77124223e6116350a5184a5199850304@natalenko.name>
         <1517924768.25841.32.camel@gmx.de>
         <8842084cc8a26b7f46ae600bda8a7bd0@natalenko.name>
         <CC8CDDA5-A232-41A6-BE1E-CDB0B361C3DB@linaro.org>
         <82ffc96aacc3945861cbb708df346338@natalenko.name>
         <E52CCDEA-279A-40D8-AD9B-F4D1AF351BF1@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 10:08 +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
> 
> The first piece of information I need is whether this failure happens
> even without "BFQ hierarchical scheduling support".

I presume you mean BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED, which I do not have enabled.

	-Mike?