Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp468022wra; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 02:16:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225fN2Hp5cuH2OQCPfc1Wl6fimOsD6d9dGo4h4aG4wFk16NQx3aKbMmJ9tqn8wspWgdtVYk0 X-Received: by 10.101.78.201 with SMTP id w9mr4572858pgq.43.1517998563725; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 02:16:03 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517998563; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kFppdl94OkvS20qDlQg+VrjPeEvT+tEowmqsjA8KU/W8mb51xmB6yNWGl8oaDFiyEf H5d8NtbKrnYKhaHcMmfWwyyHGmXz0OJMpYyRG748dGZh4IQ/dCAhxFk2kHNisS1foAEW d7NpeCfxOkAL/95ImY2nqYSlB3u5K4AzxXFTJAAapPngqMIkTPvol9sAeIEsPnH21iy1 +MdLrvtWGY20DJmK+UlIwJGH3QHE19c5JBk8PZ+1ZDQHVbwlz2ZdIKngqr+U8/dlkbXX 6RM1CSKaGJMKzIFnOWeAuaEbptJNn5pkLSIfLngBWuY1idB5rGVa4ytgs9uvnqNT24T1 cDVg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=NtLZOqRhdaA7tjHpB1pd4AicOs8llIBKlPhSwXQzeSg=; b=DFKAYhj2nyYf5z8OYYzPzdHFsDs4OWGO49fUBdTLnG1ad8BV3LWtuebKcpeOqFAHz8 Sn0BQTvY/ybtqG7fZfO2NKh6iLFiadK3qaRuRE+zwpsEhE1vRRixupukAEhyS/z5bdmM W1ygOk1vmH0vhqPL/Hj5iuQPw50dcWSWCpbfbOv/VibqDvJZDRmJEguPIN+q0UJlxMGq NdvZmGu/W4dwzji/ZNmUvRUCbrelWckfzu+E06iEwn5M07derBH+U0ee+jF1WiqxFDMD w2PgCHwmn4mlQAFT39rYI/Gl0As1K68sjZzFfOOxwgMeGwsNvo5AlIIJn2QU5usD9sJn Rmbw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t9si740699pgq.500.2018.02.07.02.15.49; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 02:16:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753597AbeBGKPL (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 7 Feb 2018 05:15:11 -0500 Received: from 9pmail.ess.barracuda.com ([64.235.150.225]:56897 "EHLO 9pmail.ess.barracuda.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753419AbeBGKPK (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2018 05:15:10 -0500 Received: from MIPSMAIL01.mipstec.com (mailrelay.mips.com [12.201.5.28]) by mx3.ess.sfj.cudaops.com (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 07 Feb 2018 10:14:51 +0000 Received: from [10.150.130.83] (10.150.130.83) by MIPSMAIL01.mipstec.com (10.20.43.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 01:44:44 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: mips-gic: Avoid spuriously handling masked interrupts To: Marc Zyngier , Thomas Gleixner CC: , Ralf Baechle , "Jason Cooper" , References: <1517849136-29508-1-git-send-email-matt.redfearn@mips.com> From: Matt Redfearn Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 09:44:41 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.150.130.83] X-BESS-ID: 1517998488-298554-22957-46559-15 X-BESS-VER: 2018.1-r1801291959 X-BESS-Apparent-Source-IP: 12.201.5.28 X-BESS-Outbound-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-BESS-Outbound-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.188376 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------- 0.00 BSF_BESS_OUTBOUND META: BESS Outbound X-BESS-Outbound-Spam-Status: SCORE=0.00 using account:ESS59374 scores of KILL_LEVEL=7.0 tests=BSF_BESS_OUTBOUND X-BESS-BRTS-Status: 1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Marc, On 07/02/18 09:41, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 05/02/18 16:45, Matt Redfearn wrote: >> Commit 7778c4b27cbe ("irqchip: mips-gic: Use pcpu_masks to avoid reading >> GIC_SH_MASK*") removed the read of the hardware mask register when >> handling shared interrupts, instead using the driver's shadow pcpu_masks >> entry as the effective mask. Unfortunately this did not take account of >> the write to pcpu_masks during gic_shared_irq_domain_map, which >> effectively unmasks the interrupt early. If an interrupt is asserted, >> gic_handle_shared_int decodes and processes the interrupt even though it >> has not yet been unmasked via gic_unmask_irq, which also sets the >> appropriate bit in pcpu_masks. >> >> On the MIPS Boston board, when a console command line of >> "console=ttyS0,115200n8r" is passed, the modem status IRQ is enabled in >> the UART, which is immediately raised to the GIC. The interrupt has been >> mapped, but no handler has yet been registered, nor is it expected to be >> unmasked. However, the write to pcpu_masks in gic_shared_irq_domain_map >> has effectively unmasked it, resulting in endless reports of: >> >> [ 5.058454] irq 13, desc: ffffffff80a7ad80, depth: 1, count: 0, unhandled: 0 >> [ 5.062057] ->handle_irq(): ffffffff801b1838, >> [ 5.062175] handle_bad_irq+0x0/0x2c0 >> >> Where IRQ 13 is the UART interrupt. >> >> To fix this, just remove the write to pcpu_masks in >> gic_shared_irq_domain_map. The existing write in gic_unmask_irq is the >> correct place for what is now the effective unmasking. >> >> Fixes: 7778c4b27cbe ("irqchip: mips-gic: Use pcpu_masks to avoid reading GIC_SH_MASK*") >> Signed-off-by: Matt Redfearn >> Reviewed-by: Paul Burton >> >> --- >> >> drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c | 2 -- >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c >> index b2cfc6d66d74..2c3684ba46e5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c >> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c >> @@ -429,8 +429,6 @@ static int gic_shared_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq, >> spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags); >> write_gic_map_pin(intr, GIC_MAP_PIN_MAP_TO_PIN | shared_cpu_pin); >> write_gic_map_vp(intr, BIT(mips_cm_vp_id(cpu))); >> - gic_clear_pcpu_masks(intr); >> - set_bit(intr, per_cpu_ptr(pcpu_masks, cpu)); >> irq_data_update_effective_affinity(data, cpumask_of(cpu)); >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags); >> >> > > Does this need to be Cc to stable (since it fixes something that was > merged in 4.14)? Sorry, missed stable off the CC list. Yes, it does indeed need to be backported. Should I resubmit? Thanks, Matt > > Thanks, > > M. >