Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272062AbTG2U3R (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:29:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272048AbTG2U3R (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:29:17 -0400 Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:16768 "EHLO 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272062AbTG2U3L (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:29:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:38:52 +0100 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200307292038.h6TKcqlu000338@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> To: john@grabjohn.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pgw99@doc.ic.ac.uk Subject: Re: PATCH : LEDs - possibly the most pointless kernel subsystem ever Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1034 Lines: 29 > > This patch adds an abstraction layer for programmable LED devices, > > hardware drivers for the Status LEDs found on some Intel PIIX4E based > > server hardware (notably the ISP1100 1U rackmount server) and LEDs wired > > to the parallel port data lines. > > I haven't had chance to test this yet, but I really like the idea - by > an amasing co-incidence, I was actually thinking about the possibility > of doing a parallel port connected front panel earlier today! > > Does anybody have any suggestions for recommended standard uses for > parallel port connected LEDs? > > Disk spinning up/disk ready > Root login active > > Any other suggestions? Ah, I just thought, for debugging purposes we could have LEDs for: * BKL taken * Servicing interrupt * Kernel stack usage > 2K John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/