Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272215AbTG2VV1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:21:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272136AbTG2VSy (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:18:54 -0400 Received: from www.13thfloor.at ([212.16.59.250]:26533 "EHLO www.13thfloor.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272215AbTG2VPM (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:15:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:15:21 +0200 From: Herbert =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=F6tzl?= To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Trond Myklebust , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: ROOT NFS fixes ... Message-ID: <20030729211521.GA19594@www.13thfloor.at> Reply-To: herbert@13thfloor.at Mail-Followup-To: Marcelo Tosatti , Trond Myklebust , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 901 Lines: 32 Hi Marcelo! just verified that the NFS root bug-fix was not included in 2.4.22-pre9, unfortunately I have to ask you again, why you do not want to fix this issue in 2.4.22 ... I do not understand why Trond obviously is ignoring my mails, regarding this particular issue, maybe he is just too busy to look at four twoline changes, and more, I do not understand why this isn't accepted into the marcelo kernel tree, as it obviously fixes a misbehaviour? please explain! It is okay for me, if your argumentation goes like "I don't like you, that's reason enough for me to not include your patches ...", but I would like to know ... best, Herbert - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/