Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272316AbTG2VbP (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:31:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272382AbTG2VbP (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:31:15 -0400 Received: from pub234.cambridge.redhat.com ([213.86.99.234]:52231 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272316AbTG2VbN (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:31:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:31:11 +0100 (BST) From: James Simmons To: Ralf Hildebrandt cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: neofb problems with 2.6.0-test1-ac3 etc. -- kernel-2.6.x ignoramus In-Reply-To: <20030729203703.GG30351@charite.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 908 Lines: 23 > > > fbset -depth 16 > > > > > > fixes things again. To see what I see, look at: > > > http://sbserv.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb/fbfubar/ > > > > This is because the X server is not fbdev aware. Try adding the UseFBDev > > option in your XF86Config. That shoudl fix your problems. > > Sorry, but this can't be: How comes the SAME X Server with the SAME > XF86Config works OK with 2.4.22-pre8, but not with 2.6.x? > > This is on the SAME machine, just with different kernel. Generally, > all 2.4.x kernels don't show the problem, but 2.6.x does. What is your configuration like for 2.4.X as compared to 2.5.X. Are you using the neofb driver in both cases? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/