Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp1072679wra; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 12:10:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226NDx2oTIvWLpVrPZRCvdwZCR7SouMdEdNmZCZ8FFnwiDeAUJpGyaTrzhF5dOdiZE53qQZ7 X-Received: by 10.99.111.11 with SMTP id k11mr5722538pgc.86.1518034226285; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:10:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518034226; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JywhY0xgSNlm0L9uPXytFhhr+Hc6DM7Fw0Rf+L+qw/d7Dtb1os3ZXW591+DxWaZWBz WR9OKKpqOjYOR/3oqOCJjFauGyQHeMRbbr1HVSCowB0/l53/nJl+HklazkST3KXjbNKW JRjfntJxQNaHkpuzTc4HadJfPiDwM9gG2FbofOptf46qsaxhR5s0R/0jAvhl4nVnG7tI YQQ0lXh4M4Ztbi28rSygRmTuWU28luwosiHI4LJpL1CG7W1kMg+lACcqp+ihBJc5VH3t HgH1XSWIll5v7iJwirruD726C0lujHwNHXF+NfsEih3nK0xURHhHuZ9Efxz7vVHOAv0L TpXw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=nQoCRapA68qsn1JFJLwoagaP9IuTnXmNEXgK1zzt+MY=; b=WffLBy8t1Hs2Wgw2hsb6TCnXpdeaSEbgfubtuMqDFRfa1PzmJ3o4c9tffZcElWuFG8 bVX11ZEBP02jLd0RWI3f8yzc2qWD4qo5iY6JISKAJb7FvWlneq+dcV1+8ztwWsVeEZHH d9wfpo02Xm5ezsGn2EHu6m5J9sUyDwwpne3dG7WVc491PFIsEmqWRcecF7gyFZNzbGEB TMG3JeaaPTqq1oLBmBhjD2DyjyTnORYPcHdIWLCrapMO6ryqvKOOJ/p+Hm4GwYm9Jxd/ 24fhLAEgs5MT8KCggjVmWRo9cydb2DnzV8smtBjG8JTpBs7eUdxRxrCl0tzLHvvxuUnN rh7A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=LN58F4r7; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h6-v6si1574834plt.72.2018.02.07.12.10.12; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:10:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=LN58F4r7; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754455AbeBGUJb (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 7 Feb 2018 15:09:31 -0500 Received: from mail-pl0-f68.google.com ([209.85.160.68]:40339 "EHLO mail-pl0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754127AbeBGUJ3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2018 15:09:29 -0500 Received: by mail-pl0-f68.google.com with SMTP id g18-v6so715444plo.7; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:09:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nQoCRapA68qsn1JFJLwoagaP9IuTnXmNEXgK1zzt+MY=; b=LN58F4r73S2vaImMuml9UesjFNY7rwGHEmRrhp2YKhbTFFz5zXe9YkHwezpzQMxnAs mqJcjOmj4X/2UGjMsFbF0M/OfMY7oz4XStZzImTZDi1Ecdcp+IA9piI4mrOuVOYAWwjU IALailojNcQXmCcVHzI180wSEkVHds2pkXVIqCURmoHdwZVqP0lLIanllfE5bqhXmXRy yCPvdsJkkclTfgcC5A7UqdmWxjcdhiIwQaSUrdmJceQR5kTXLa8kA53aBb8idAPidYex O7PAK0+RwinxzGhHcJssPvFsmzo5wDph4/GR55t3+V15NfyYvG+n6K7NKZm7HEvJtpRt x9/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nQoCRapA68qsn1JFJLwoagaP9IuTnXmNEXgK1zzt+MY=; b=Q/oytehrDErYHYrLn6NZjdLU/DIpedayv6ZVAFaurK3yplaadufss6jJgUo/VVWmdF /I54kf8qAz+QkloXTt2GsXZXCGEcVYtmTfD8vQux138pihCXT2WzOfblxJOmbj3Vq7Z/ D3Ns2I0Jmnso/r0Big4mh9VW1Y0/eGyy47bZ2ZKuzvnQn3OhyzgNADyf0+/IdCol5u8o asDKwWid40SRJhkt5j+pNpQvhv5Gsk29A3dCH87kaeR0ZKYx2+dGQq+nICEMWsaD0RPu PDFf5pIKWa1oCvOtjqwOHVIiQUXklcL62rIy6q/MUFDeZk64qdHqlbDOBHFWKXNuMkyB 5E8g== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDkC+FHbt/SEJdnKX5nX4KxhTueeukRF+s9lOfmHT1RnXolv+iQ cXy9N84cm/2/+BraImbFrY0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6b89:: with SMTP id p9-v6mr7162447plk.377.1518034168855; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:09:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.70] (c-73-93-215-6.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.93.215.6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s89sm5322133pfk.35.2018.02.07.12.09.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:09:27 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: cache phandle nodes to decrease cost of of_find_node_by_phandle() To: Chintan Pandya , Rob Herring Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1517429142-25727-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> <5b84a166-c71b-3a41-9e7f-a7624a8441f6@codeaurora.org> <38cdcae5-ec0f-d1be-b024-1990d4387731@gmail.com> <9e23d32f-05a0-ce8a-41f8-9a1a3d66be37@codeaurora.org> <567731e8-8f89-bd6e-c3d4-e36400e69198@codeaurora.org> <0db129ef-ffd8-96fe-46a7-55fb575272e3@gmail.com> <0a178f4b-75fe-0564-7b0e-596f52fca1dc@codeaurora.org> <1768c791-7456-c1fe-578b-f6245e79746f@codeaurora.org> From: Frank Rowand Message-ID: <2e95e5f3-0f50-fb06-354e-918b48a55732@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 12:09:26 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1768c791-7456-c1fe-578b-f6245e79746f@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/07/18 04:44, Chintan Pandya wrote: > > > On 2/5/2018 5:53 PM, Chintan Pandya wrote: >> >>> >>> My question was trying to determine whether the numbers reported above >>> are for a debug configuration or a production configuration. >> My reported numbers are from debug configuration. >> >>> not a production configuration, I was requesting the numbers for a >>> production configuration. >> I'm working on it. But please expect some delay in my response for this. As I mentioned earlier, I need to work with few teams to get these numbers. >> >> >>> show a significant boot time reduction from the patch then there is >>> less justification for adding complexity to the existing code.  I >>> prefer to use simpler data structures and algorithms __if__ extra >>> complexity does not provide any advantage.  The balance between >>> complexity and benefits is a core software engineering issue. >>> >> Ok > > Avg Kernel boot time comparison in production set up: > > [0] Base: 4519ms > [1] 4115ms (~400ms improvement) > [2] 4115ms (~400ms improvement) > [3] 4177ms (~340ms improvement) > > Full data: > [1] 1024 sized pre-populated cache > ITR-1    ITR-2    ITR-3    ITR-4    Avg > 4115    4123    4124    4107    4115 > > [2] Dynamic sized cache allocation/free > ITR-1    ITR-2    ITR-3    ITR-4    Avg > 4122    4131    4106    4118    4115 > > [3] Fixed 64 sized cache > ITR-1    ITR-2    ITR-3    ITR-4    Avg > 4153    4186    4198    4181    4177 > > > [1] is my experimental patch and dirty enough to not get merged anywhere. So, I will not push it. > > > > Chintan Thank you very much. This looks like a real improvement to me. I'll rebase my patches, updated to address the comments, on 4.16-rc1. -Frank