Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 8 Feb 2018 11:05:53 +0800
From:   "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com>
To:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc:     "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com>, jolsa@redhat.com,
        peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: A problem about 'perf sched latency'
Message-ID: <20180208030552.cng3ro72qg3e5uhp@intel.com>
References: <20180206135002.sn32vfqgfz326rcb@intel.com>
 <20180208005724.GB24686@sejong>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180208005724.GB24686@sejong>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171027-42-ad8712
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 09:57:24AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
> 
[snip]
> > Does anyone know why? Thank you! :)
> 
> It seems your data doesn't have wakeup event which is required by the
> 'perf sched latency'.
> 
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
> 
Hi Kim,
Thanks for your reply. I thought the 'Swicthes' is the total number of sche-in event.
Now I know it only count wakeup sched-in event. It is not documented, so confused me.

> 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Thanks,
> > Changbin Du
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Thanks,
Changbin Du