Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180208134908.4b516794@alans-desktop>
References: <CAP8WD_YnJnQW9o+t2jn6HRrY3kKQMRD44joP=thPYO5vS4ev7Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <1517950494.3677.30.camel@infradead.org> <CAP8WD_ZaewC-NE4szBzU3brvNhvV9PwoVo-uDFcEMTMWVbsxQQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <201802070918.18978.linux@rainbow-software.org> <20180208134908.4b516794@alans-desktop>
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date:   Thu, 8 Feb 2018 16:22:40 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2kuHXpJOVKux2v-B_=CrpnQBTMfV24sJqY+nQaSMf+KA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] x86 : i486 reporting to be vulnerable to Meltdown/Spectre_V1/Spectre_V2
To:     Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:     Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>, whiteheadm@acm.org,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <eduval@amazon.com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:49 PM, Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>> What about Pentium II and 3? I'm using 5 such machines (and also a Pentium
>> MMX). I've tried a spectre test before and it wasn't reading anything useful.
>> Don't know about meltdown. Is there a complete test program? (The web is so
>> full of crap that even google can't find anything useful.)
>
> For x86 speculation came in (as far as I can tell) in
>
> AMD Am5x86
> Cyrix 5x86, but branch predictors are disabled by default according to
> the docs
> Cyrix 6x86, branch prediction on by default
> Pentium Pro
>
> There are later processors that don't have speculation: Quark series, Nat
> Semi/Cyrix Geode, earliest AMD geode (I think), some Intel Atom
> processors.

Wasn't Am5x86 just a 486 clone? AFAICT, speculation only came with the
K6 (Am6x86 aka NexGen Nx6x86)

All the Geode are apparently derived from Cyrix 5x86 (I always thought
it was a 6x86, but the internet disagrees). For Geode GX, a
specification update at [1] mentions a special procedure for enabling
branch prediction, Geode LX apparently gets this right and always
has branch prediction.

> The more obscure ones - the Transmeta apparently may, the IDT Winchip
> documentation strongly implies it doesn't

The Winchip is what eventually turned into the VIA Nano, which does
have speculative execution, but I don't think the earlier C3 and C7 did,
they are much closer to the original Winchip design.

       Arnd

[1] http://support.amd.com/TechDocs/31533E_gx_2.1_specupdate.pdf