Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp2234902wra; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 10:32:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225OSL8ZcyJ7XUY1u5z7nc05n4Ep8V8wNcYfcfR9bVOVR/gBTeAryZM/TDXMkUCl+o8ZKjdr X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:5305:: with SMTP id b5-v6mr41839pli.61.1518114777859; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 10:32:57 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518114777; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lc5WWsO2ATjwqbr92jU84+1spChKQ1XrWGYKqjVbUv95AkoKl52cjyTr4ChrIfrzqj 0MU7x0elljlrhuAFmFGtjcSZtDTA7kbrcMnOQk92f/iDCN5loQYVbNv0kOb7G4aZWzaH /T+hasvgOwS1GeQFKGaahSG2reOKWAjONFHgZcRvnsU+lEupVkmwtcZwQQKE07icX9+B 6Ts+ApuAqIJooBD/PjbGonqrer23b1SBrIkHPXSijnvZrxvbZYTZdZ8x6YkNR/i6YHvZ zjGc8qkQpuEOVAMPISJRdge9y0vYJkTKgElXl3ZCcXs9xoZgnP8ISFyQKe6kksCU6YW3 WUXA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=eIt+12WDRMQdCM/+XCYD+dCZL5h5qhFTs0Lx0G/VbOY=; b=Tlr7WSHqS96EmDPClsoke1R58ODZrlJY86AkKzaDVsJpq/J7EkeaMYqtQ0zVNbp6XG ngwE27ZKuSzKcgQk76YexKPELgUlVdZBvvanFWLu4DRDopBcWwgmlZOPrzQZsumLI9MQ yPwcGo9vStNKAlUGzpTh2eyOWcMmShRQvzxmgLIw9rrLdsmyf6JNZ1rwamO+8BPZBsDr 4F5VT+65wkHWSW7QKP9/5YB0X+Nc+y8yId4GsQ7KFTnd5ZoJNfWA1U0pnONazkdgXrxc skFLXKafqe9Ja7AP5eiqcJFFJZ6u9Hor6dy6k02dVssffiUAsq5gJ9X+8YbNN5Nt0pkp KQCw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.co.uk Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 94-v6si285869plb.807.2018.02.08.10.32.42; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 10:32:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.co.uk Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752154AbeBHSbn (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:31:43 -0500 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([46.235.227.227]:48664 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752396AbeBHSbD (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:31:03 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: sre) with ESMTPSA id 650A5272779 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 19:30:59 +0100 From: Sebastian Reichel To: Tomi Valkeinen Cc: Pavel Machek , Tony Lindgren , Laurent Pinchart , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 00/14] omapdrm: DSI command mode panel support Message-ID: <20180208183059.uynz4nwfzyz2oed7@earth.universe> References: <20170724173311.27170-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk> <5c747b23-c586-4997-cf92-2725483343c5@ti.com> <20180208094105.GB4595@amd> <7202f913-8048-885a-ac90-eeb49a3bed31@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fxcs5yvanxpca5ip" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7202f913-8048-885a-ac90-eeb49a3bed31@ti.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --fxcs5yvanxpca5ip Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 12:53:16PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 08/02/18 11:41, Pavel Machek wrote: > >> I've also picked patches 7-12. > >=20 > > It seems that part of the support made it to v4.16. Is it supposed to > > be complete? > >=20 > > I still have these in my tree, and result works on Nokia N9. Is there > > any way I can help with the merge? >=20 > I picked the patches that seemed safe to pick. I think we can do another > review round if someone rebases and posts the patches. Although I see > that they have conflicts with other patches that have been posted, so > we'll see how it goes. >=20 > Btw, you seem to have something in your tree that was not in the series. > Nothing in the series touches mipi_display.h. I have a rebased series based on recent origin/master. It works properly on Droid 4 (omap4), but has issues on omap3 even with the fifo bug fix applied. I do not yet know the reason, but I think we should proceed anyways. I originally planned to send this based on rc1, but will do so now. -- Sebastian --fxcs5yvanxpca5ip Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE72YNB0Y/i3JqeVQT2O7X88g7+poFAlp8l1kACgkQ2O7X88g7 +pq8wg//UUjS8R4lQ/72MFGaBsqUBCszDjW/0zwDQ8GhfeOoOLnHadVQ9aeplWdE 8rJ3izpf+DmRkl33sDgsq51WHv6LuLHqEjMuhEbOgOUeA/6hAq/0MegM+qpWHbjE cK2rSM/j0BXCYw3y4gaVqKVpkB8sNoxiYVM8vGdpgJFLRuPMb+n7U6+kh4Y6ITyc ez5eZI5ujYFUyxFdv1vZ1uorfH+m70LVNy1JwiS98lfZr8tDAMHJ/s6iHppvrum4 T3ffpUG2Ct8LIDGfTB1Bf3g1QRV5TB9R5QC2gcbG2ZYfasCUJMNXsZyHJkpRROoD bujuc1PKPgwHfPNRkarE5N3gxK/V56cH+KqCCEG+KEbSJ3QBN+yoxHdjEdNYE5bO +0DzPb/LDsTrT1dbfl63jxsc7lOt1wCws3bB031D70CFkJcI7DTaOLB1lLqMxenD q1lQ4D6CzvUCv557ASs9+8YtFhwAI/Uo929ooTzUFKFh9s4oXGSesgYQAyge3Iqb n8yDRoYmrKRFU8DgZj8oOp2wZYkXRnk4ilIrkPKcyWOAOXcaRdiZuZjTpLNu91Rj qYqz0V2LMUmRKmv0qZNbLRiJ02+h1LWT2J9L68u3M6RXQQ6IzFmcYEsde2EaDgP8 +jJMb3ei7W+RJRsiDNFqO/bwrAU8Oll6VpGAr681e2B7qY0vuWY= =sRfS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fxcs5yvanxpca5ip--