Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@huawei.com>
Subject: [V9fs-developer] [RFC] we should solve create-unlink-getattr idiom
To:     Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>, Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>,
        <v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net>, <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
CC:     <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ron Minnich <rminnich@sandia.gov>,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
        Veaceslav Falico <veaceslav.falico@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <5A7D4976.6060407@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Feb 2018 15:10:46 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Eric and Greg,

I encountered the similar problem with create-unlink-getattr idiom.
I use the testcase that create-unlink-setattr idiom, and I see the
bug is reported at https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1336794.
Then I also see you already fix the issue and push the patch to upstream.
https://github.com/ericvh/linux/commit/eaf70223eac094291169f5a6de580351890162a2
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/626194/

Unfortunately, the two patches are not merged into master, I don't know
the reason, so I suggest if the patche can be merged into master, and
it will solve the create-unlink-getattr idiom.

Thanks,
Yiwen