Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 9 Feb 2018 08:58:56 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc:     "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.de>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [STABLE 4.9.y PATCH 0/9] Backport of KVM Speculation Control
 support
Message-ID: <20180209075856.GA13110@kroah.com>
References: <1517938181-15317-1-git-send-email-dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
 <9ea4d52a-7ae6-a179-2f86-1e7b77255387@redhat.com>
 <1517951146.3677.34.camel@amazon.co.uk>
 <20180208024959.GA16399@kroah.com>
 <20180208171436.GA3521@kroah.com>
 <d609eb51-b5eb-0d39-070b-e8fe0e2837f7@redhat.com>
 <20180208175737.GA22067@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20180208175737.GA22067@kroah.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 06:57:38PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 06:42:03PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 08/02/2018 18:14, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 03:49:59AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 09:05:46PM +0000, Woodhouse, David wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 19:01 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >>>> On 06/02/2018 18:29, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > >>>>> I've put together a linux-4.9.y branch at?
> > >>>>> http://git.infradead.org/retpoline-stable.git/shortlog/refs/heads/linux-4.9.y
> > >>>>> ?
> > >>>>> Most of it is fairly straightforward, apart from the IBPB on context?
> > >>>>> switch for which Tim has already posted a candidate. I wanted some more
> > >>>>> review on my backports of the KVM bits though, including some extra
> > >>>>> historical patches I pulled in.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Looks good!? Thanks for the work,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Paolo
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks. In that case, Greg, the full set is lined up in
> > >>> http://git.infradead.org/retpoline-stable.git/shortlog/refs/heads/linux-4.9.y
> > >>> or git://git.infradead.org/retpoline-stable linux-4.9.y
> > >>
> > >> Many thanks for all of this work.  I've now queued up all of these.
> > > 
> > > There's a problem with the backport of 6342c50ad12e ("KVM: nVMX:
> > > vmx_complete_nested_posted_interrupt() can't fail") as there is still a
> > > check in the function that can fail:
> > > 
> > > 		vapic_page = kmap(vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page);
> > > 		if (!vapic_page) {
> > > 			WARN_ON(1);
> > > 			return -ENOMEM;
> > > 		}
> > > 
> > > Do we need something else before this patch in order to fix this?  I
> > > guess kmap really can't fail, should I just drop the whole (!vapic_page)
> > > check?
> > 
> > Yes, that would be commit 42cf014d38d8822cce63703a467e00f65d000952.
> > Should David or I respin?
> 
> No need, I can sneak it into the middle of the series :)  I'll do it
> later tonight and let you know if I have any problems, thanks for
> pointing out the needed commit.

Now queued up.