Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp642689wra; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 05:01:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224hY6gmFBgT0o4HMuco1ZQUnkUiSFDphDNve87XuUpkiPh8EvnwFNug8Nmi9g+cPm+BHq6P X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:25ab:: with SMTP id y40-v6mr2626074pla.140.1518181305758; Fri, 09 Feb 2018 05:01:45 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518181305; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FnVCVK5bgi27/r/lwujsfn2GkK2MzHB59ukQ2KJGsMdSO1lIN10z5gIRkuBCa12ml6 kvxh/1CU+L7IqjN8RZ8oozCm18HRqBCfUwxkBZmdSKUKJHardaZ6u97p6h6ja1dHPyIw mbDWiDII2I886GydvNmAmGsLoThEpplBk0k9DTUzEOBLbjBVdMq7FI4KVDMtcsliNV9V NL9MPGegr5jATpP5xLDqFWnGtTWJnR0BMD/kRF7tDaxPZBcTuEqHWpUNoPoDnzCt4xhu 5/Gx6VtiFewhNjp/53NuD+DF6oEPeQIONMkafQiSkxEKqOd9D+2ms3IjDjxEB2XmmrSH 96Vg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=/xpRLzzLhmIH9LWLJGv2WNXc4rOL7ryIsoDfTbGNk7E=; b=YpHaTtByFujskUgFmG3a/XerQ6CEWqIcjicbyIVeGEffDwszO8uJFDYujOZY3hGJp5 bW4tV1fbBKxqOW7iQJ4y4uYEiwHFeiul/AMSD29fl9QVEEcFwApHbh+W6h042VQoE4sp NzGzN6/i7c4SFdVlGXKxDG805gOWxeQl0oXenxeORnyGqpEAITiKw6cUMONOPZ28m5Vy lgQREi5fMdw4MBajsDpVU20E07FD/ErCj4ZTVFeIfiXM18srQ7K+1PjVty8AvwCfKZi8 /ybapKyvmEuHhW3ka7+aUQQY5STePek5VcnnFrSCvd1oqKmM/AG9r00BBnIRm3SWFUow uaog== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f10si1363287pge.270.2018.02.09.05.01.29; Fri, 09 Feb 2018 05:01:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752028AbeBIM71 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 9 Feb 2018 07:59:27 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46558 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750997AbeBIM7Z (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2018 07:59:25 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB165ACE9; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 12:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 13:59:22 +0100 (CET) From: Miroslav Benes To: Petr Mladek cc: Jiri Kosina , Josh Poimboeuf , Jason Baron , Joe Lawrence , Jessica Yu , Evgenii Shatokhin , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/7] livepatch: Support separate list for replaced patches. In-Reply-To: <20180206103424.10829-6-pmladek@suse.com> Message-ID: References: <20180206103424.10829-1-pmladek@suse.com> <20180206103424.10829-6-pmladek@suse.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, Petr Mladek wrote: > From: Jason Baron > > We are going to add a feature called atomic replace. It will allow to > create a patch that would replace all already registered patches. > > The replaced patches will stay registered because they are typically > unregistered by some package uninstall scripts. But we will remove > these patches from @klp_patches list to keep the enabled patch > on the bottom of the stack. Otherwise, we would need to implement > rather complex logic for moving the patches on the stack. Also > it would complicate implementation of the atomic replace feature. > It is not worth it. > > As a result, we will have patches that are registered but that > are not longer usable. Let's get prepared for this and use > a better descriptive name for klp_is_patch_registered() function. > > Also create separate list for the replaced patches and allow to > unregister them. Alternative solution would be to add a flag > into struct klp_patch. Note that patch->kobj.state_initialized > is not safe because it can be cleared outside klp_mutex. > > This patch does not change the existing behavior. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Baron > [pmladek@suse.com: Split and renamed klp_is_patch_usable()] > Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek > Cc: Josh Poimboeuf > Cc: Jessica Yu > Cc: Jiri Kosina > Cc: Miroslav Benes > --- > kernel/livepatch/core.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c > index fccb603942f1..11632fe8716a 100644 > --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c > +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c > @@ -47,6 +47,13 @@ DEFINE_MUTEX(klp_mutex); > > static LIST_HEAD(klp_patches); > > +/* > + * List of 'replaced' patches that have been replaced by a patch that has the > + * 'replace' bit set. When they are added to this list, they are disabled and > + * can not be re-enabled, but they can be unregistered(). > + */ > +LIST_HEAD(klp_replaced_patches); It should be static, I think. It is used only in kernel/livepatch/core.c. And sparse complains about it. With that fixed Acked-by: Miroslav Benes Miroslav