Received: by 10.223.176.5 with SMTP id f5csp717505wra; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 06:09:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2268Ywo5FvjF10DAGXP2R4NJT1onwdTm+bGCYmNS+Hcc8VKnH4c0kXnPB++zDe/3hCRdhOwW X-Received: by 10.98.64.132 with SMTP id f4mr2950172pfd.232.1518185387194; Fri, 09 Feb 2018 06:09:47 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518185387; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0UwVESP1Bj8Jf6Zt8DjUOZSfblqUKxP57n4o+Htcd/azoWOBGC54DazinfN+3hOnrx MQSC18UD/wPad2yhBV5ly7ic3ZRWjUQVqM/GFZrShzIYSVeD6cqYZTb1Evp8eJoyWS6f Zt7TPQwRLCq7B/ZTRorLR88PVaYTuO9+2R2gDc4rjjXc5QW3nyML6sLwYLRbBtSWQd8+ +6ZwFXrOoB+HKjb2IG7BVatlM7yAa30+pqYkfZ3j/DZwbCPBSg31fbSOaB4j+hfXy9X6 cVEVroV8+KeieIq7zVk6sxr1JbYuOevJgazZupTeCfzv9HXaQey2ATh0inCtSrkdYxFT E1sQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=qWTxznYorpi9PAYn4buJA2oTttMMST1JEvmS6hXpJ+s=; b=K2nfj5KM7I6f88lsxene38o92vFRpi/10/bmg2WhzIY59N0TP+PAg++gM3q3q4D7T9 106x7YVm54jDlvJcIyp175H/FARSyrgtJk3O28xmnTHPjBk9o7ue6ST18RtAnhopWFvV LFodTTwgTGOahhCmqCOhw6tTD8A6oVvIGjam0vHv+tnkU79NYJP9OZ8X2BH5cbj0QSJ+ 6P7SOiJJu71n7cT9vjZLgU93XgdN0HH2NYXjm5iqOXdUjdcpkF+Gu1e5nHGgC/lDLrRE zJar9ir0rTx0N6LTKWxKlR24m1eVfXDP4xeM7Sop9tpKVmVkINATMsYPIRXdsqU7NgnX BvJw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t3si1415717pgs.472.2018.02.09.06.09.33; Fri, 09 Feb 2018 06:09:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753018AbeBINml (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 9 Feb 2018 08:42:41 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:49934 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752946AbeBINmk (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2018 08:42:40 -0500 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12258-90.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.71.90]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 495D9F5E; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 13:42:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: [PATCH 4.9 18/92] serial: core: mark port as initialized after successful IRQ change Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 14:38:47 +0100 Message-Id: <20180209133932.595583765@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.1 In-Reply-To: <20180209133931.211869118@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180209133931.211869118@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior commit 44117a1d1732c513875d5a163f10d9adbe866c08 upstream. setserial changes the IRQ via uart_set_info(). It invokes uart_shutdown() which free the current used IRQ and clear TTY_PORT_INITIALIZED. It will then update the IRQ number and invoke uart_startup() before returning to the caller leaving TTY_PORT_INITIALIZED cleared. The next open will crash with | list_add double add: new=ffffffff839fcc98, prev=ffffffff839fcc98, next=ffffffff839fcc98. since the close from the IOCTL won't free the IRQ (and clean the list) due to the TTY_PORT_INITIALIZED check in uart_shutdown(). There is same pattern in uart_do_autoconfig() and I *think* it also needs to set TTY_PORT_INITIALIZED there. Is there a reason why uart_startup() does not set the flag by itself after the IRQ has been acquired (since it is cleared in uart_shutdown)? Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c @@ -965,6 +965,8 @@ static int uart_set_info(struct tty_stru } } else { retval = uart_startup(tty, state, 1); + if (retval == 0) + tty_port_set_initialized(port, true); if (retval > 0) retval = 0; }