From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Voluspa <lista1@telia.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] O11int for interactivity
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:51:33 +1000
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2
References: <20030730123122.3970c7bf.lista1@telia.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030730123122.3970c7bf.lista1@telia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200307302051.33503.kernel@kolivas.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1135
Lines: 27

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:31, Voluspa wrote:
> On 2003-07-30 8:41:46 Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> > Wops! Wait a minute! O11.1 is great, but I've had a few XMMS skips
> > that I didn't have with O10. They're really difficult to reproduce,
>
> Can't reproduce your skips here with my light environment and O11.1 (on
> a PII 400, 128 meg mem, no desktop, Enlightenment as wm). Even as I
> write this my machine is under the most extreme load that I have -
> natural, not artificial:

Good test. Thanks.

> As to difference between O10 and O11.1 in feel... No comment. I'm too
> old to catch such small variations.

That's good, most of the difference was supposed to be in extremely unusual 
circumstances. Felipe's issue is something I was concerned might happen (not 
specifically an audio issue per se but audio is a sensitive way to pick it 
up) which is why all testing is important.

Con

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/