Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180209190226.lqh6twf7thfg52cq@suse.de>
References: <1518168340-9392-1-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org>
 <1518168340-9392-10-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org> <CA+55aFzB9H=RT6YB3onZCephZMs9ccz4aJ_jcPcfEkKJD_YDCQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180209190226.lqh6twf7thfg52cq@suse.de>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 9 Feb 2018 11:17:35 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzy6ZJDUpgHY0J2_z4kODaiYPgyHuOsMGiXmrhgR3kyPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/31] x86/entry/32: Leave the kernel via trampoline stack
To:     Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <eduval@amazon.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        "Liguori, Anthony" <aliguori@amazon.com>,
        Daniel Gruss <daniel.gruss@iaik.tugraz.at>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
        Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> wrote:
>
> Okay, I used movsb because I remembered that being the recommendation
> for the most efficient memcpy, and it safes me an instruction. But that
> is probably only true on modern CPUs.

Yeah, it's only true on the very latest uarchs, and even there it's
not perfect for small copies.

On the older machines that are relevant for 32-bit code, it's often
tens of cycles just for the ucode overhead, I think, and "rep movsb"
actually does things literally a byte at a time.

              Linus